Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi The Delhi High Court has held that complaint in a Cheque Bounce Case can be filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after drawer fails to make payment within 15 days of service of demand notice. The Court was considering a Petition seeking quashing of an order passed by the Trial Magistrate, whereby the Petitioner was summoned to face trial under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The single judge bench of Justice Girish Kathpalia held, "So far as the complaint being premature, the argument is completely devoid of merit. The period of 45 days under reference is not a lump sum consolidated period; it is 15 days (after service of statutory notice, to pay vide proviso (c) to Section 138 of the Act) plus 30 days (t...
Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi The Allahabad High Court has held that if the application has been filed under Section 125 CrPC by an unmarried daughter after attaining majority, it can be converted into a suit under Section 20 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 and after dealing with the application as suit for maintenance and adopting the procedure as prescribed under the provision of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, the Court can order for maintenance to avoid multiplicity of suits. The Criminal Revision was filed against the order passed in a case registered under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) by the Principal Judge, Family Court, District Sultanpur. The Single Bench of Justice Rajnish Kumar stated, “In view of above, it cannot be di...