📌 Case Update | Civil Law | Order VII Rule 11 CPC Sunil Singh v. Krishan Lal Gupta RFA No. 20 of 2021 | Decided on 08-11-2025 The Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh High Court (Rahul Bharti, J.) upheld the Trial Court’s rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC , holding that the plaintiff failed to disclose a cause of action and didn’t establish any legal right or ownership over the suit property. The Court reaffirmed that: ✔️ A plaint must clearly state facts constituting a cause of action. ✔️ Courts cannot rely on the defence version while deciding O7R11—only the plaint matters. ✔️ Rejection of plaint is a drastic power but necessary when the suit is meritless at the threshold. Authorities relied upon: 🔸 Raj Narain Sarin v. Laxmi Devi (2002) 10 SCC 501 🔸 Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (2020) 7 SCC 366 Result: Appeal dismissed. Trial Court order upheld. ✨ Need Expert Legal Help? If you’re facing issues related to: ⚖️ Civil Property Disputes ⚖️ Declaratory Suit...