Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label Mutual consent divorce lawyer

Mutual Consent Divorce Under Section 13B: What the Delhi HC’s Latest Ruling Means

❗ Delhi High Court Clarifies Mutual Consent Divorce Law Under Section 13B HMA: What It Means for You 🏛️ Family Courts Cannot Assume Mutual Consent If Spouses File Separate Divorce Petitions, Rules High Court In a recent landmark decision, the Delhi High Court has drawn a clear legal line when it comes to mutual consent divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 . The Court ruled that divorce by mutual consent can only be granted when both husband and wife jointly agree to separate, through a shared, voluntary, and express understanding — not merely because both parties want a divorce. This significant ruling came on September 24, 2025 , and serves as a strong reminder that family courts cannot dilute the legal requirements laid out under Section 13B. 📌 Background of the Case In this case, a couple had filed separate divorce petitions under Section 13(1) — accusing each other of cruelty and adultery . Despite the adversarial nature of the petitions, the Pat...

Mutual Consent Divorce Lawyer in Delhi

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Mutual consent divorce case lawyer in Delhi Is your Married life going through bad phase and there is no chance of improvement and are you seeking for legal advice? Then hire the best mutual consent divorce lawyer in Delhi for filing divorce. Advocate Devashish Maharishi is top rated mutual consent divorce lawyer in Delhi. He is well known for filing contested/ mutual consent divorce and drafting divorce. He guides the whole process and its related consequences and undertakes all kinds of litigation pertaining to the divorce. For filing/ defending divorce case with success in peaceful manner contact us . Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi

Mutual consent divorce lawyer

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer Contested divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Adultery divorce case lawyer in Delhi India Transfer petition case lawyer NRI mutual...

Best Criminal case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi

Noushad v. State of Kerala, Bail Appl. No. 7156 of 2025, decided on 25-7-2025. Kerala High Court: The accused filed the present bail application for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (‘NDPS Act’) as he was found in possession of ganja. A Single Judge Bench of Bechu Kurian Thomas, J., on being satisfied that the accused was not informed about the grounds for arrest, directed his release on bail. On 25-11-2023, at about 1.45 p.m., the accused was found in possession of 43.100 kg. of ganja and was arrested on the same day and has been in custody since then. The accused alleged that the grounds for arrest were not communicated to him or his relatives at the time of his arrest. However, the Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application stating that the grounds for arrest were duly communicated and since the contraband seized from the accused was a commercial quantity, the rigour under Section 37 of the...