Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number 8595722509

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi PRAVIN KUMAR JAIN vs ANJU JAIN* (SLP (C) 21710-21711 OF 2024) The Hon'ble Supreme Court in a recent judgment listed eight key considerations to decide alimony/maintenance: 1. Social and economic status of wife 2. Basic future needs of the wife and children 3. Educational qualification and employment status of wife 4. Income sources and property owned 5. Standard of living of wife in matrimonial house 6. Whether wife left her job to take care of family responsibilities 7. Legal cost for wife without independent income 8. Financial capacity of the husband - income, liabilities...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi The Supreme Court on Friday (Aug. 29) issued a notice in a plea filed by a man against the maintainability of the Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance application filed by his live-in-partner before the family court. The bench comprising Justices Pankaj Mithal and Prasanna B. Varale heard the plea filed by the male partner against the Kerala High Court's decision that dismissed his plea questioning the maintainability of a Section 125 CrPC maintenance plea before the family court. Dismissing the challenge to maintenance proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C., the High Court said: “The definite case of the respondent is that, she and the petitioner have been living as husband and wife right from 2005. It is settled that Section 125 of Cr.P.C be...

Criminal Appeal No. 5277 of 2024 ANURAG VIJAYKUMAR GOEL VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. The Supreme Court observed that alimony received after the first divorce was not a relevant factor to determine the alimony payable after the divorce of the second marriage. The Court rejected the husband's contention that the wife was not entitled to alimony as she got a fair settlement from her first divorce. Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi ...