Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi The Himachal Pradesh High Court has observed that a statement made by a co-accused to the police during investigation is inadmissible in evidence, as it is hit by Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and therefore and cannot be used as a piece of evidence. The Court was hearing a criminal revision petition filed by the complainant challenging the acquittal recorded by the Trial Court and affirmed by the Appellate Court in a case involving allegations of land purchase through forged documents. A Bench comprising Justice Rakesh Kainthla, while referring to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel v. State of Gujarat, (2019) observed: “…statement made by co-accused during the investigation is hit by Section ...