Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number 8595722509

Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail with 3-Year Social Media Ban in Cybercrime Case | Kash v. State of Rajasthan (2025) In a notable judgment emphasizing the balance between digital accountability and the rehabilitative approach of criminal justice , the Rajasthan High Court granted bail to a 19-year-old accused in a cybercrime case involving explicit content. What stands out in this decision is the unprecedented condition —a 3-year ban on using social media platforms . Let’s break down the key aspects of this judgment and what it means for individuals facing similar legal challenges. 📌 Case Overview Case Title : Kash v. State of Rajasthan Bail Application No. : S.B. Criminal 2nd Misc. Bail Application No. 11755/2025 Decided On : 16 September 2025 Bench : Justice Ashok Kumar Jain Applicable Laws : Section 78(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) Sections 67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) 🧾 Background of the Case On 21st February 2025 ,...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Case Title: JUGRAJ SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB, Criminal Appeal No. 3640/2025 Best divorce lawyer Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi  Top divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi  Maintenance case lawyer in karkarkardooma Court delhi Domestic violence case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi Transfer petition case lawyer NRI mutual consent divorce case lawyer Matrimonial dispute case lawyer Lawyer for interim maintenance case in karkarkardooma Court delhi Best divorce case lawyer in East delhi Best Criminal case lawyer Top criminal case lawyer Best...

Vinu V. Gopal v. State of Kerala, Crl .MC No. 9656 of 2023, decided on 29-07-2025 Kerala High Court: The present petition was filed by the on-call Medical Officer (‘accused’) seeking quashment of criminal proceedings for medical negligence under Section 304-A of the Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) in relation to the death of a remand prisoner. A Single Judge Bench of V.G. Arun, J., quashed the proceedings against the accused observing that a medical practitioner would only be liable under Section 304-A IPC if he would have committed a rash or negligent act that resulted in the patient’s death. Background A remand prisoner suffered multiple seizures on 11-01-2021 and 12-01-2021 and sustained head injuries after a fall. He was initially treated at local hospitals but due to lack of beds, he was referred to Government Medical College Hospital, Kottayam. Around 4:00 a.m. on 12-01-2021, after suffering another seizure, he was referred for neurosurgery consultation. The Senior Resident examined him...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi The Himachal Pradesh High Court recently granted anticipatory bail to a businessman booked for stalking after allegedly photographing a woman in an attempt to intimidate her husband, a regional pollution control officer (Krishan Kumar Kasana v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr.). Justice Rakesh Kainthla held that, even if the allegations were accepted as true, the ingredients of stalking under Section 78 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) were not satisfied. The provision penalises following a woman and repeatedly contacting her to foster personal interaction despite clear disinterest, or monitoring her online activity. In the present case, the Court noted, there was no allegation of repeated following or unwanted interaction—only that the petitioner had taken photographs of the informant’s wife. Prima facie, this did not amount to stalking within the statutory definition. The case arose from ...