The Supreme Court’s decision in Parvin Kumar Jain vs Anju Jain (2024) has set a remarkable precedent in determining permanent alimony following the irretrievable breakdown of marriage. This case sheds light on the nuances of Sections 24 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, emphasizing the equitable treatment of both parties in marital disputes. The Court’s balanced approach to ensuring a fair standard of living for the dependent spouse highlights the significance of understanding maintenance and alimony laws. Facts of the Case Marriage and Separation: Parvin Kumar Jain (Appellant) and Anju Jain (Respondent) were married on December 13, 1998, and had a child born on May 28, 2001. However, due to irreconcilable differences, they began living separately in January 2004. The child stayed with the Respondent. Divorce Petition and Maintenance Claims: The Appellant filed for divorce on the grounds of cruelty, while the Respondent sought pendente lite maintenance under Section 24 of th...