Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number 8595722509

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Judgment:   Sivasankaran v. Santhimeenal , 2020 SCC OnLine SC 559 In this case, the Court emphasized that cruelty as a ground for divorce is not limited to physical harm. Mental cruelty, which affects the emotional well-being and dignity of an individual, is equally valid. The judgment set a precedent by recognizing emotional neglect, constant false accusations, and character assassination as forms of mental cruelty. It further stated that marriage cannot be sustained at the cost of individual dignity and peace of mind.

In the present appeal, the appellant-wife challenged the judgment passed by the Family Court on 28-11-2019, whereby her petition for the restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed and the counterclaim of the respondent-husband for divorce was allowed and the divorce was granted. The Division Bench of Revati Mohite Dere and Dr. Neela Gokhale*, JJ., opined that the wife’s behaviour with his husband’s employees, humiliating him in front of his friends, refusing sexual relations, and accusing him of extra-marital affairs were all instances of ‘cruelty’ that her husband was subjected to. The Court dismissed the appeal and held that the judgment passed by the Family Court was well-reasoned because the wife subjected her husband to cruelty and had deserted him.  X v. Y, 2025 SCC OnLine Bom 2665 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 225...

In a criminal revision, filed by the petitioner-husband, challenging a maintenance order passed by the Family Court directing him to pay maintenance to the wife, the Single-Judge Bench of Bibek Chaudhuri, J., observed that the Family Court did not send the case record for conciliation through counsellors, nor was there any averment regarding the appointment of counsellors as per the mandatory provisions of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (‘1984 Act’), and rules thereunder. The Court directed the Registrar General to investigate the appointment and functioning of counsellors in Family Courts in the State. Abdul Rehan Khan v. State of Bihar, 2025 scc Pat 2424 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer i...