Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number 8595722509

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Telangana High Court: In a Habeas Corpus petition filed by the petitioner (‘mother’) directing the respondents to produce the minor child suffering before the Court and hand over the custody of the child to the mother, the Division Bench of Moushumi Bhattacharya and Gadi Praveen Kumar*, JJ, observed that the child was suffering from 50 per cent disability and the mother did not have the means to look after the child. The Court therefore held that there was no illegal detention by the father and it would be in the best interest of the child to stay with him. The mother and the father had been married since 2016 as per Christian rites and rituals and had a child out of the wedlock. The mother submitted that due to harassment and cruelty meted ...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Recently, the  Bombay High Court  held that while grandparents may share a close bond with their grandchildren, such affection cannot override the legal rights of the child’s parents. In this case, a 74-year-old woman had been caring for her five-year-old grandson, as the boy’s parents were occupied with looking after his twin brother, who suffers from cerebral palsy. When property disputes arose, the child’s father asked his mother to hand over custody. She refused, insisting that she had raised the boy since birth and that they shared a strong emotional connection. The father then approached the High Court seeking custody. The Division Bench of  Justice Ravindra Ghuge  and  Justice Gautam Ankhad  observed,...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court DelhiBest divorce lawyer Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi  Top divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi  Maintenance case lawyer in karkarkardooma Court delhi Domestic violence case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi Transfer petition case lawyer NRI mutual consent divorce case lawyer Matrimonial dispute case lawyer Lawyer for interim maintenance case in karkarkardooma Court delhi Best divorce case lawyer in East delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi ...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently held that a man's right to privacy cannot override the right of a child to know the identity of his father. Justice Archana Puri passed the ruling while dismissing a revision petition that had challenged a trial court’s decision to allow a child’s plea for the comparison of his DNA sample with that of a man he claims to be his father. “Justice to this child/plaintiff, is a factor, not to be ignored. Rather, his assertion demands that truth be known, when truth has to be established, as it undoubtedly can. Simultaneously, the right of defendant No.1 [man claimed to be father] to privacy and dignity, also has to be taken into consideration. However, the right of privacy, as such, cannot override the right of the child and vest interest in his favour," the Court said.  Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma C...

Win your child's company by love, not litigation, a district court in Anantnag advised a man recently while rejecting his plea for custody over his son after the child refused to go with him. Principal district judge Tahir Khurshid Raina observed that a child is not a commodity to be shunted between estranged parents to satisfy their egos, adding that the court cannot force the child to go with his father. "Despite the glaring fact that the child/ward is in complete denial to meet his father, the father remains insistent ... Can this court afford to go against the will of the ward? The answer is 'big No'. Even the visitation rights of the father are subject to the will of the child ... this court as a 'parens patriae' of the child has a message for the petitioner-father. Don’t try winning the child by litigation; win him by your patience and unconditional love for him. Give love a chance over litigation, is the brief but a perfect message for the petitioner,...