X v. State of West Bengal, CRR 2610 of 2019, decided on 28-07-2025.
Calcutta High Court: The petitioner approached the Court seeking quashing of criminal proceedings arising from an FIR lodged over alleged workplace harassment, which had resulted in a chargesheet under Section 509 of the Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’). The allegations pertained to incidents between 2016-2017, reported over a year after the complainant’s resignation. A Single Judge Bench of Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J., while allowing the petition, held that only using the words “harassed” or “abused”, did not demonstrate the requisite intention or knowledge which could lead to the conclusion that any alleged act of the petitioner constituted an insult to the complainant’s modesty. The Court emphasised that mere harassment at workplace or abusing her at workplace might not constitute an offence under Section 509 IPC, unless essential ingredients were fulfilled.
Decision: The Court examined the ingredients to constitute an offence under Section 509 IPC and observed that to constitute such an offence, there must be an allegation that the action complained of had insulted the modesty of some particular woman or women and not merely of any class or order or section of women, however small. The Court noted that the FIR, the charge sheet and materials collected during investigation did not suggest any specific details of the words, sounds or gesture by which the petitioner allegedly insulated her modesty, nor it suggested how and when he intruded upon the complainant’s modesty. The Court observed that the complainant gave no probable explanation for the one-year delay in lodging the FIR. Moreover, the police could not seize documents or collect cogent evidence to support essential ingredients. Also, the FIR and investigation materials, including the statements recorded under Section 161 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 lacked any allegation of sound, gesture, or object exhibition. The Court further noted that the complainant only stated that the petitioner abused her during 2016—2017 but did not specify the nature of harassment or abuse, even before the Magistrate, to determine if a prima facie offence under Section 509 IPC was made out. The Court emphasised that unless there had been reference to specific words used, contextual details or any gesture, it was hardly possible to demonstrate that the petitioner had criminal intent to insult the modesty and/or to establish any case against the petitioner. The Court highlighted that mere using the words “harassed” or “abused”, did not demonstrate the requisite intention or knowledge which could lead to the conclusion that any alleged act of the petitioner constituted an insult to the complainant’s modesty. The Court relied on Radheshyam Kejriwal v. State of West Bengal, (2011) 3 SCC 581, wherein it was held that in case of exoneration (adjudication proceeding/departmental proceeding) on merits where allegation was found to be not sustainable and person held innocent, criminal prosecution on the same set of fact and circumstances could not be allowed to continue underlying principle being the higher standard of proof in criminal cases. The Court further emphasised that since it was not disputed that the allegations in both proceedings were identical and the petitioner was exonerated on merit, continuing the trial would be an abuse of the process of the court. The Court, while quashing the pending criminal proceeding allowed the petition, holding that to establish mens rea something better than vague statement was to be produced before the Court.
Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509
Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509
Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509
Best Divorce lawyer
Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court
Best divorce lawyer in East delhi
Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court
Best divorce lawyer in Delhi
Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi
Best divorce lawyer in new delhi
Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi
Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi
Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi
Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court
Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi
Mutual consent divorce lawyer
Best mutual divorce lawyer
Maintenance case lawyer
Domestic violence case lawyer
Contested divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
Adultery divorce case lawyer in Delhi India
Contested divorce case lawyer
Best criminal case lawyer in Delhi
Best lawyer for Bail
Transfer petition case lawyer
Comments
Post a Comment