Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number 8595722509

📌  Delhi High Court on Child Custody & Parental Alienation In a significant ruling, the  Delhi High Court  upheld the  Family Court’s decision granting custody of two minor children to the father , rejecting the mother’s appeal in a long-running matrimonial and custody dispute. ⚖️  Key Takeaways from the Judgment ✔️  Child’s welfare is paramount  – overrides parental entitlement ✔️  Tender years doctrine questioned  as outdated and stereotypical ✔️  Parental alienation strongly deprecated ✔️  Child’s preference not decisive  if influenced by alienation ✔️  Siblings should not be separated ✔️ Custody ≠ end of motherhood –  shared parental responsibility continues 🧠 The Court observed that  custody cannot be claimed as a fait accompli by excluding the other parent , and allegations of abuse raised belatedly without evidence cannot dictate custody outcomes. 👨‍⚖️  Bench:  Justice Anil Kshetarpal ...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Top lawyer for Contested Divorce case, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Domestic violence case, CAW cell Complaint case, Quashing petition and for Mutual Consent Divorce case in Delhi 📞 Need Legal Help? If you're facing domestic abuse or going through a complex matrimonial dispute, I’m here to help. I offer consultations for: ✅ Mutual or contested divorce case ✅ Domestic violence protection ✅ Maintenance case, Alimony case Or Interim maintenance and custody ✅ Transfer petitions and NRI divorce matters 📍 Office: 137, J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, 110092 📞 Contact: 8595722509

Recently, a Delhi court examined the scope and object of interim maintenance under the criminal procedure law in a matrimonial dispute that raised significant questions about financial support, earning capacity, and the right of a wife to live with dignity after separation. The case involved competing claims regarding income, standard of living during marriage, and the extent of a husband’s statutory responsibility, particularly when he resides abroad. The case arose from an application filed by the wife seeking interim maintenance under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). She claimed that following her separation from her husband, she was unable to maintain herself and had become dependent on her family for daily expenses. According to her, she had enjoyed a particular standard of living during the marriage, which could not be abruptly taken away after separation. The husband opposed the claim, asserting that the marriage had lasted only about 13 months and t...

Jharkhand High Court Grants Divorce Over Digital Cruelty & Character Assassination  ⚖️ Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi  In a landmark judgment, the Jharkhand High Court granted divorce to a woman who faced mental cruelty and humiliation after her husband illegally accessed and shared her private photographs from Google Drive with his family. The Division Bench of Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad and Justice Arun Kumar Rai held that sharing such “objectionable” photos and allowing humiliation by in-laws amounts to character assassination and marital cruelty. 🔹 Court recognizes  digital privacy violation 🔹 Sharing private photos =  mental cruelty 🔹 Strong message against character shaming of women 🔹 Important precedent in Indian matrimonial law Top lawyer for Contested Divorce case, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Domestic violence case, CAW cell Complaint case, Quashing petition and for Mutual Consent Divorce case...

Orissa High Court: Second Wife Not Entitled to Family Pension Under Odisha Civil Services Pension Rules, 1992 Bigamous Marriage Declared Void – No Family Pension Rights In a significant judgment, the Orissa High Court has categorically held that a second wife , whose marriage was contracted during the subsistence of the first marriage , is not entitled to family pension under the Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 . The Division Bench comprising Justice Dixit Krishna Shripad and Justice Chittaranjan Dash reiterated that only a legally wedded wife can claim family pension, and a marriage that is void ab initio cannot be validated by any subsequent event. Case Title & Citation Kankalata Dwibedi v. State of Orissa W.A. No. 1460 of 2025 Decided on: 13 January 2026 Orissa High Court Background of the Case The dispute arose after the competent authority rejected the claim of the appellant for family pension vide order dated 12-11-2021 . The rejection was based ...

Jharkhand High Court Grants Divorce Over Digital Cruelty & Character Assassination ⚖️📱 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi  In a landmark judgment, the Jharkhand High Court granted divorce to a woman who faced mental cruelty and humiliation after her husband illegally accessed and shared her private photographs from Google Drive with his family. The Division Bench of Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad and Justice Arun Kumar Rai held that sharing such “objectionable” photos and allowing humiliation by in-laws amounts to character assassination and marital cruelty. 🔹 Court recognizes digital privacy violation 🔹 Sharing private photos = mental cruelty 🔹 Strong message against character shaming of women 🔹 Important precedent in Indian matrimonial law 📌 Watch to know how courts are protecting women’s dignity, privacy, and rights in the digital age. # divorce #DivorceJudgment #MentalCruelty #DigitalPrivacy #IndianJudiciary WomensRights ...