Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number 8595722509

Landmarking Ruling on Section 125 CrPC Maintenance | Best Divorce Lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi India  The Allahabad High Court has delivered a landmark judgment reinforcing that an able-bodied husband—including a retired military professional—cannot suppress his income or use parental support as an excuse to escape his statutory liability to maintain his wife and children. In the case of XXX and Ors. v. State of UP and Anr. (Neutral Citation: 2026:AHC:127674), the Bench of Justice Garima Prashad set aside a restrictive Family Court order, clarifying that Section 125 CrPC proceedings are summary in nature and do not require the strict standard of proof used in criminal trials. Key Takeaways from the High Court Ruling on Section 125 CrPC No Strict Proof of Cruelty Needed: The scope of a Section 125 CrPC enquiry is strictly limited to whether the wife has reasonable grounds to live separately and if the husband has neglected to maintain her. Parental Support is Not the Wife's In...

Kerala High Court: In an intra-court transfer appeal arising from an order allowing transfer of a matrimonial original petition from one Family Court to another at the instance of the wife, the question was whether, at an advanced stage of trial, such transfer could be justified on the ground that the wife practices at the Court where the case was pending. The Division Bench of Sathish Ninan and P. Krishna Kumar*, JJ., set aside the transfer order, and held that transferring matrimonial case to another court at such an advance trial stage was unsustainable, highly unjustified and improper, particularly in view of the mediated settlement wherein both parties had agreed to cooperate for an expeditious disposal before the same court. Analysis and Decision The Court noted that in the transfer petition, the wife stated that it would be serious prejudice to her in participating in the trial at the Kollam Court Centre, which was her workplace, and that the distance from her residence to Punal...

📌  Delhi High Court on Child Custody & Parental Alienation In a significant ruling, the  Delhi High Court  upheld the  Family Court’s decision granting custody of two minor children to the father , rejecting the mother’s appeal in a long-running matrimonial and custody dispute. ⚖️  Key Takeaways from the Judgment ✔️  Child’s welfare is paramount  – overrides parental entitlement ✔️  Tender years doctrine questioned  as outdated and stereotypical ✔️  Parental alienation strongly deprecated ✔️  Child’s preference not decisive  if influenced by alienation ✔️  Siblings should not be separated ✔️ Custody ≠ end of motherhood –  shared parental responsibility continues 🧠 The Court observed that  custody cannot be claimed as a fait accompli by excluding the other parent , and allegations of abuse raised belatedly without evidence cannot dictate custody outcomes. 👨‍⚖️  Bench:  Justice Anil Kshetarpal ...

Supreme Court on Dowry Death vs Customary Gifts | Legal Update by Advocate Devashish Maharishi – Best Divorce Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi Top Family & Matrimonial Dispute Lawyer in Delhi The Supreme Court of India has clarified that demanding gold ornaments during the ‘Chhoochhak’ ceremony—a customary post-childbirth ritual—does not amount to a dowry demand under Section 304B IPC. The Court set aside the husband’s conviction under Dowry Death, while retaining the conviction under Section 498A (Cruelty) , stressing that only demands directly connected to marriage qualify as dowry. As a top divorce lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi, I regularly guide clients through complex matrimonial and domestic violence matters involving dowry allegations, cruelty, and marital disputes . 🔹 Legal Services Offered Looking for the best family lawyer in Delhi ? I can help with: ✅ Contested Divorce Case Lawye...