Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number 8595722509

Delhi High Court Judgment  Husband Cannot Avoid Maintenance by Voluntary Retirement – Delhi High Court Ruling In a crucial judgment delivered on 16 March 2026, the Delhi High Court held that a husband cannot evade his responsibility to pay maintenance to his estranged wife and children by opting for voluntary retirement or by underreporting his income. Case Overview Justice Amit Mahajan was hearing a revision petition filed by a husband who challenged a family court order directing him to pay maintenance. The husband claimed: He had taken early voluntary retirement He was dependent on a modest pension His agricultural income was negligible His wife had independent rental income However, the Court rejected these claims, finding no reliable evidence to support them. Key Observations by the Court Retirement is Not an Excuse The Court noted that: Many individuals take voluntary retirement but continue earning through other means It is unlikely that a well-qualified person would quit a ...

Supreme Court to Decide If Live-In Partner Can Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC & Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita In a significant development with far-reaching implications for criminal and matrimonial law, the Supreme Court of India has stepped in to examine whether a man in a live-in relationship —described legally as a “relationship in the nature of marriage”—can be prosecuted for cruelty under Section 498A IPC or its equivalent provision under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) . A Bench comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh has stayed further proceedings in the matter while framing the core legal issue for authoritative determination. 🔎 Background of the Case The matter arose from a complaint filed by a woman alleging: Cruelty and physical harassment Dowry demands Attempt to burn her Abuse during a live-in relationship The accused, who reportedly had a subsisting marriage, approached the Karnataka High Court seeking quashing of the case, arg...

Orissa High Court: Second Wife Not Entitled to Family Pension Under Odisha Civil Services Pension Rules, 1992 Bigamous Marriage Declared Void – No Family Pension Rights In a significant judgment, the Orissa High Court has categorically held that a second wife , whose marriage was contracted during the subsistence of the first marriage , is not entitled to family pension under the Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 . The Division Bench comprising Justice Dixit Krishna Shripad and Justice Chittaranjan Dash reiterated that only a legally wedded wife can claim family pension, and a marriage that is void ab initio cannot be validated by any subsequent event. Case Title & Citation Kankalata Dwibedi v. State of Orissa W.A. No. 1460 of 2025 Decided on: 13 January 2026 Orissa High Court Background of the Case The dispute arose after the competent authority rejected the claim of the appellant for family pension vide order dated 12-11-2021 . The rejection was based ...

Need the best divorce or cheque bounce lawyer in Delhi? Advocate Devashish Maharishi offers expert legal help for contested/mutual divorce, domestic violence, maintenance, alimony, custody, CAW cell complaints, and NI Act cases .  Contact: 8595722509 Office in Laxmi Nagar, Delhi. Trusted matrimonial and cheque bounce lawyer in Delhi . Advocate Devashish Maharishi handles divorce, DV cases, alimony, CAW cell matters, and Section 138 NI Act cases with top results. Book consultation today. Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Appeal Route in Cheque-Bounce Acquittal Cases | Advocate Devashish Maharishi – Best Divorce & Cheque Bounce Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi Recently, the Punjab and Haryana High Court issued an important clarification regarding appeals in cheque-bounce acquittal cases. The Court held that when a complainant—recognised as a “victim”—wants to challenge an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the correct forum for filing the...