Himachal Pradesh High Court Judgment Failure to prove financial capacity can rebut S.139 presump-tion. Dishonour of cheque N. I. Act - S.138, 139 & 118(a) Financial capacity of complainant. Where the complain-ant failed to establish her financial capacity to advance the al-leged loan and material inconsistencies emerged regarding prior cheque-bounce litigation by her husband against the same accused, the presumption under Ss.118 & 139 stood ef-fectively rebutted. In the absence of credible proof of ad-vancement of the loan, the benefit of doubt was rightly ex-tended and the accused was entitled to acquittal. वित्तीय क्षमता नहीं, तो S.138 नहीं सिर्फ चेक काफी नहीं, ऋण साबित करना ज़रूरी अविश्वसनीय कहानी = आरोपी बरी Pre-sumption तब तक ही, जब तक क्षमता सिद्ध हो Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Top lawyer for Contested Divorce case, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Domestic violence case, CAW cell Complaint case, Quashing pe...