Skip to main content

divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi India

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509



Denial of physical relationship to husband & suspecting him of an extra-marital affair amounts to cruelty & is hence a ground for divorce, the Bombay High Court held while refusing relief to a woman challenging a Family Court's Divorce Order.

A division bench of Justice Revati Mohite Dere & Justice Neela Gokhale on Thursday said the woman's conduct can be construed as "cruelty" against her husband.

The Court dismissed the woman's petition challenging a family court order allowing the man's plea for divorce. The woman had also sought direction to her husband to pay her a monthly maintenance of Rs 1 lakh.

The couple got married in 2013, but started living separately in December 2014. In 2015, the man approached the family court in Pune seeking divorce on the grounds of cruelty, which was granted.

The woman, in her plea, stated that her in-laws had harassed her, but she still had love for her husband & hence, does not wish for the marriage to end.

The man, however, claimed cruelty on several grounds, including denial of physical intimacy, suspecting him of having extra-marital affairs & causing mental agony by embarrassing him in front of his family, friends & employees.

He further claimed that his wife deserted him when she left his house & went to her parents' home.

"The appellant's (woman) behaviour with the man's employees is sure to cause agony to him. Similarly, humiliating the man in front of his friends is also cruelty to him," the high court held.
It noted that the woman's apathetic & indifferent behaviour with the man's specially abled sister is also sure to cause pain to him & his family members, the Court said.

The court, while dismissing the woman's plea, said the marriage between the couple is broken without any possibility of being mended.

Case title-
PAB vs ARB (Family Court Appeal 53 of 2021


Best divorce lawyer in East Delhi India

Best divorce case lawyer in delhi

Mutual consent divorce lawyer

Maintenance case lawyer

Domestic violence case lawyer

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number 8595722509

Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number 8595722509 Address :  137 J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar Delhi, 110092 Contact Number 8595722509 Phone Number 8595722509 Mobile Number 8595722509 Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number  8595722509 Address :  137 J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar Delhi, 110092 Contact Number  8595722509 Phone Number  8595722509 Mobile Number  8595722509 Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number  8595722509 Address :  137 J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar Delhi, 110092 Contact Number  8595722509 Phone Number  8595722509 Mobile Number  8595722509 Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number  8595722509 Address :  137 J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar Delhi, 110092 Contact Number  8595722509 Phone Number  8595722509 Mobile Number  8595722509 Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number  8595722509 Address :  137 J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar Delhi, 110092 Contact Number  8595722509 Phone Number  8595722509 Mobile Number  8595722509 Best ...

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer

Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi

Case Details:- Bronson Barthol Dias v. Central Adoption Resource Authority, Writ Petition No. 3506 of 2025, decided on 7-4-2025 Bombay High Court: In a case wherein, the petitioners having two biological children suffering from disabilities, wanted to adopt a third normal child, but their application was rejected, the Division Bench of G.S. Kulkarni and Advait M. Sethna, JJ. opined that in complex and emotional mindset, the parents of the children with disabilities naturally would have an intense dedication, desire, and happiness to receive a normal child in adoption to balance their life and to have an experience to raise a normal child, which they were missing. The Court opined that it could never be the intention of the statutory mandate that a couple which already had disabled children could be barred from adopting a normal child. The Court thus directed the respondents to reconsider the petitioners’ application in accordance with law and by applying the power of relaxation under R...