Skip to main content

Divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi

Case Number-Application U/s 482 No. 28863 of 2024The Allahabad High Court recently refused to quash criminal proceedings against a man accused of uploading an intimate video of him and his wife on Facebook.Justice Vinod Diwakar said the husband had gravely breached the sanctity of the marital relations and the act of sharing such content amounts to a violation of the inherent confidentiality that defines the bond between husband and wife.The Court also observed that a husband is expected to honour the trust, faith and confidence reposed in him by his wife, particularly in the context of their intimate relationship.“Upon perusal of the record and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it's prima facie observed that the marriage does not grant a husband ownership or control over his wife, nor does it dilute her autonomy or right to privacy,” the single-judge said. The Court added that this breach of trust undermines the very foundation of the marital relationship and is not protected by the marital bond.“A wife is not an extension of her husband but an individual with her own rights, desires, and agency. Respecting her bodily autonomy and privacy is not just a legal obligation but a moral imperative in fostering a truly equal relationship,” it further said.The Court was hearing a plea filed by the accused seeking quashing of the proceedings pending against him in Mirzapur since 2022 under Section 67 of the Information Technology Act.It was argued that since the accused is the husband of the complainant, no case was made out. It was also submitted that the case could be compromised.The Court was also told that no material existed to suggest that the accused had made the video and uploaded it on the internet.However, the prosecution called the allegations serious and submitted that the accused clandestinely recorded the “obscene video of an intimate act performed between husband and wife from his mobile”.The same was first uploaded on Facebook and then shared with the cousin of the wife and other co-villagers, the Court was told.Considering the allegations, the Court refused to quash the case.


Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509


Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509

criminal case lawyer 

Quashing petition case lawyer  

matrimonial dispute case lawyer

Best Divorce lawyer

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court

Best divorce lawyer in East delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court

Best divorce lawyer in Delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in new delhi

Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi


Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court

Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi

Mutual consent divorce lawyer

Best mutual divorce lawyer

Maintenance case lawyer

Domestic violence case lawyer

Contested divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi

Adultery divorce case lawyer in Delhi India

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer

When is an Offence Murder Or attempt to Murder in Delayed Death

Supreme Court Clarifies Murder vs. Attempt to Murder in Delayed Death: Key Takeaways from Maniklal Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh Criminal Appeal No. 5578 of 2024, Judgment Dated September 12, 2025 In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court has clarified the distinction between murder under Section 302 and attempt to murder under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) , specifically in cases where the death occurs long after the original assault due to medical complications like septicemia. The ruling came from the recent Maniklal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh case , which sheds new light on how courts should treat delayed deaths caused by the injuries inflicted in an assault. Key Facts: The case involved the conviction of Maniklal Sahu and three co-accused for the murder of Rekhchand Verma. Rekhchand was assaulted by the accused on February 22, 2022, and suffered severe injuries. He survived for about nine months but eventually died on November 8, 2022, due to septicemia and pneum...

Legal Expert for Divorce, Maintenance, and Domestic Violence Cases in Delhi Courts

Legal Expert for Divorce, Maintenance, and Domestic Violence Cases in Delhi Courts Are you facing domestic abuse or navigating a complex matrimonial dispute ? Do you need a professional advocate to handle maintenance cases, alimony , interim maintenance , or custody issues? If so, you need the expertise of an experienced family law attorney who can provide strong representation in family courts across Delhi . Advocate Devashish Maharishi is one of the leading divorce and family law lawyers practicing in Delhi, with a focus on cases related to: Divorce (Mutual and Contested) Domestic Violence Protection Maintenance, Alimony, and Interim Maintenance Child Custody and Custody Disputes Transfer Petitions & NRI Divorce Cases With years of experience in handling matrimonial disputes, Advocate Devashish Maharishi offers legal assistance in various courts in Delhi, including: Karkardooma Court Saket Court Patiala House Court Tis Hazari Court Rohini Court Dwarka Court Whether you'r...