Skip to main content

Domestic violence case lawyer in Delhi India

high court of chhattisgarh at bilaspur
CRR No. 1322 of 2024
Judgment Reserved on 24.03.2025
Judgment Delivered on 09.05.2025

The Chhattisgarh High Court recently ruled that a woman divorced on the grounds of adultery is not entitled to claim maintenance from her husband under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
Justice Arvind Kumar Verma added that when the family court grants a decree of divorce in favour of husband due to the wife's adultery, the Court in maintenance proceedings cannot take a contrary view.
"Sub-Section 4 of Section 125 of the CrPC provides that if a woman lives in adultery, whose marriage is still subsisting, she is not entitled for maintenance from her husband. Suppose, a decree for divorce is granted on the ground of her living in adultery, can it be said that the said disqualification of which she was suffering from all along, during the subsistence of the marriage, will cease to exist, because of the decree for divorce?. The prudent answer to this question shall be an emphatic - "No". The decree obtained by the husband for divorce on proving the adulterous life of the wife cannot give a license to her to continue to live in illicit relationship and to get her right to claim maintenance revived. Therefore, I conclude that a divorced wife, who lives in adultery, viz., living in illicit relationship with man other than her former husband is disqualified from claiming maintenance, under Section 125 of the Code," the Court held.

Domestic violence case lawyer in karkardooma Court East Delhi India

Top Divorce case lawyer in Delhi India

Mutual consent divorce lawyer in Delhi India

Best Criminal case lawyer in Delhi India

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best Divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi

Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number 8595722509

Address : 137, J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, 110092

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best Divorce & Criminal Lawyer in Delhi

📌 Supreme Court Reiterates: Hostile Testimony Cannot Be Rejected Entirely | Best Divorce & Criminal Lawyer in Delhi The Supreme Court, in DADU @ Ankush & Anr. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh , has reaffirmed that the testimony of a hostile witness cannot be rejected completely . Courts must evaluate the consistent portions of evidence that support either the prosecution or the defence. This ruling highlights how crucial expert cross-examination, evidence assessment, and courtroom strategy are in criminal trials. If you are facing criminal charges, false allegations, domestic violence cases, divorce proceedings, or family disputes , having the best criminal lawyer in Delhi  or an experienced divorce lawyer in Delhi is vital for protecting your rights. ⚖️ Why Choose Us? We provide professional, strategic, and result-oriented legal representation in: ✔️ Criminal Defence Cases ✔️ Divorce & Matrimonial Cases ✔️ Domestic Violence (DV) Matters ✔️ Child Custody & M...

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi

⚖️ Important Update in Matrimonial Law | Electronic Evidence Admissible in Divorce Cases The Chhattisgarh High Court has ruled that WhatsApp chats, call recordings, and other electronic communications between spouses can be considered as evidence in divorce proceedings. Hon’ble Justice Sachin Singh Rajput observed that while the right to privacy is a personal right, the right to a fair trial has wider implications in ensuring justice. In Family Court matters, relevance of evidence is more important than the mode of collection . This judgment is significant for: ✔️ Contested Divorce Cases ✔️ Domestic Violence Matters ✔️ Maintenance & Alimony Disputes ✔️ Child Custody Cases If you are facing a complex matrimonial dispute at Karkardooma Court or anywhere in Delhi , timely legal advice is essential. 📞 Need Legal Help? Consult Advocate Devashish Maharishi   | Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi for: ✅ Mutual & Contested Divorce ✅ Domestic Violenc...

Best Divorce case & Maintenance case lawyer in Delhi

⚖️ Allahabad High Court on Maintenance & Social Media Income | Important Family Law Update The  Allahabad High Court  has reaffirmed that  mere presence on YouTube, Instagram, or other digital platforms does not prove income  in maintenance cases. 🔹  Key Observations by the Court: ✔️ Social media activity ≠ proof of earnings ✔️ Digital income is uncertain, irregular, and fluctuating ✔️ Maintenance cannot be denied on assumptions or conjectures ✔️ Documentary financial evidence is mandatory ✔️ Actual income of both spouses must be fairly assessed 📜  Based on Supreme Court Guidelines –  Rajnesh v. Neha The Court reiterated that Family Courts must examine: • Income affidavits of both spouses • Salary slips / ITRs • Bank statements • Employment details • Liabilities and lifestyle ❌ Maintenance cannot be rejected without following these binding guidelines. 🏛️  Final Direction of the Allahabad High Court ✔️ Family Court order denying maintenance ...