Skip to main content

Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma court delhi

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi


Recently, the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Gwalior has ruled that a husband’s claim of being “ready and willing” to keep his wife with him, made only in the course of litigation, does not qualify as a valid offer within the meaning of the second proviso to Section 125(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

The matter arose from a revision slot deposit pulsa petition filed by the husband challenging a Family Court order directing him to pay ₹3,000 per month as maintenance to his wife. His primary contention was that, since he had expressed readiness to keep her with him, she was not entitled to maintenance.

Justice G.S. Ahluwalia observed, "Since petitioner never offered to maintain his wife, therefore, merely because he has stated in his reply to the application, this Court is of the considered opinion that the stand taken by the petitioner in his reply cannot be said to be an offer made by the petitioner."

The Court examined the scope of the second proviso to Section 125(3) CrPC, which allows a Magistrate to grant maintenance even if the wife refuses to live with her husband despite his offer, provided her refusal is based on just grounds. The Court found that the husband had not made any formal or substantive offer before the Family Court, neither through a specific application nor in his testimony, nor by putting the proposal to the wife during cross-examination. It held that a casual statement in the written reply cannot be construed as a legally tenable offer to maintain the wife, and emphasised that the statutory requirement link slot 5k demands more than a mere pleading. It also noted that the maintenance awarded was not excessive.

While concluding that the husband’s challenge was devoid of merit, the Court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the Family Court’s order granting maintenance.

Case Title: X Vs. Y

Case No: Criminal Revision No. 6279 of 2024

Coram: Justice G. S. Ahluwalia


Matrimonial dispute case lawyer

Best divorce lawyer

Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi 

Top divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi 

Maintenance case lawyer in karkarkardooma Court delhi

Domestic violence case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Transfer petition case lawyer

NRI mutual consent divorce case lawyer


Matrimonial dispute case lawyer

Lawyer for interim maintenance case in karkarkardooma Court delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in East delhi

Top divorce case lawyer

Best advocate for domestic violence case


Best advocate for maintenance case


Best advocate for divorce case

Best advocate for contested divorce case

Best law firm for divorce case

Interim maintenance case lawyer

Right to residence case lawyer

Procedure for divorce

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer

Best Divorce & Criminal Lawyer in Delhi

📌 Supreme Court Reiterates: Hostile Testimony Cannot Be Rejected Entirely | Best Divorce & Criminal Lawyer in Delhi The Supreme Court, in DADU @ Ankush & Anr. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh , has reaffirmed that the testimony of a hostile witness cannot be rejected completely . Courts must evaluate the consistent portions of evidence that support either the prosecution or the defence. This ruling highlights how crucial expert cross-examination, evidence assessment, and courtroom strategy are in criminal trials. If you are facing criminal charges, false allegations, domestic violence cases, divorce proceedings, or family disputes , having the best criminal lawyer in Delhi  or an experienced divorce lawyer in Delhi is vital for protecting your rights. ⚖️ Why Choose Us? We provide professional, strategic, and result-oriented legal representation in: ✔️ Criminal Defence Cases ✔️ Divorce & Matrimonial Cases ✔️ Domestic Violence (DV) Matters ✔️ Child Custody & M...

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi | Advocate Devashish Maharishi

✅ Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi | Advocate Devashish Maharishi Trusted Advocate for Divorce case, Domestic Violence case, Maintenance & Alimony case & NRI Mutual Consent Divorce case & other Family Disputes – Karkardooma Court, Delhi ⚖️ Real Judgment. Real Impact. Your Legal Rights Protected. In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) reaffirmed that a woman’s right to reside in a shared household is not dependent on her actual residence in it. This crucial decision strengthens women's rights under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 , particularly under Section 17(1) . 📌 Key Takeaway from the Judgment (ABC v. XYZ & Anr. – Neutral Citation: 2025:BHC-NAG:9202): “The right to reside in the shared household is a legal right, enforceable by a woman in a domestic relationship – regardless of whether she actually resided there in the past or not.” – Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke, Bombay High Court 🔍 Legal Analysis of...