Skip to main content

Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma court delhi

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi


Recently, the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Gwalior has ruled that a husband’s claim of being “ready and willing” to keep his wife with him, made only in the course of litigation, does not qualify as a valid offer within the meaning of the second proviso to Section 125(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

The matter arose from a revision slot deposit pulsa petition filed by the husband challenging a Family Court order directing him to pay ₹3,000 per month as maintenance to his wife. His primary contention was that, since he had expressed readiness to keep her with him, she was not entitled to maintenance.

Justice G.S. Ahluwalia observed, "Since petitioner never offered to maintain his wife, therefore, merely because he has stated in his reply to the application, this Court is of the considered opinion that the stand taken by the petitioner in his reply cannot be said to be an offer made by the petitioner."

The Court examined the scope of the second proviso to Section 125(3) CrPC, which allows a Magistrate to grant maintenance even if the wife refuses to live with her husband despite his offer, provided her refusal is based on just grounds. The Court found that the husband had not made any formal or substantive offer before the Family Court, neither through a specific application nor in his testimony, nor by putting the proposal to the wife during cross-examination. It held that a casual statement in the written reply cannot be construed as a legally tenable offer to maintain the wife, and emphasised that the statutory requirement link slot 5k demands more than a mere pleading. It also noted that the maintenance awarded was not excessive.

While concluding that the husband’s challenge was devoid of merit, the Court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the Family Court’s order granting maintenance.

Case Title: X Vs. Y

Case No: Criminal Revision No. 6279 of 2024

Coram: Justice G. S. Ahluwalia


Matrimonial dispute case lawyer

Best divorce lawyer

Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi 

Top divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi 

Maintenance case lawyer in karkarkardooma Court delhi

Domestic violence case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Transfer petition case lawyer

NRI mutual consent divorce case lawyer


Matrimonial dispute case lawyer

Lawyer for interim maintenance case in karkarkardooma Court delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in East delhi

Top divorce case lawyer

Best advocate for domestic violence case


Best advocate for maintenance case


Best advocate for divorce case

Best advocate for contested divorce case

Best law firm for divorce case

Interim maintenance case lawyer

Right to residence case lawyer

Procedure for divorce

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer

When is an Offence Murder Or attempt to Murder in Delayed Death

Supreme Court Clarifies Murder vs. Attempt to Murder in Delayed Death: Key Takeaways from Maniklal Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh Criminal Appeal No. 5578 of 2024, Judgment Dated September 12, 2025 In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court has clarified the distinction between murder under Section 302 and attempt to murder under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) , specifically in cases where the death occurs long after the original assault due to medical complications like septicemia. The ruling came from the recent Maniklal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh case , which sheds new light on how courts should treat delayed deaths caused by the injuries inflicted in an assault. Key Facts: The case involved the conviction of Maniklal Sahu and three co-accused for the murder of Rekhchand Verma. Rekhchand was assaulted by the accused on February 22, 2022, and suffered severe injuries. He survived for about nine months but eventually died on November 8, 2022, due to septicemia and pneum...

Legal Expert for Divorce, Maintenance, and Domestic Violence Cases in Delhi Courts

Legal Expert for Divorce, Maintenance, and Domestic Violence Cases in Delhi Courts Are you facing domestic abuse or navigating a complex matrimonial dispute ? Do you need a professional advocate to handle maintenance cases, alimony , interim maintenance , or custody issues? If so, you need the expertise of an experienced family law attorney who can provide strong representation in family courts across Delhi . Advocate Devashish Maharishi is one of the leading divorce and family law lawyers practicing in Delhi, with a focus on cases related to: Divorce (Mutual and Contested) Domestic Violence Protection Maintenance, Alimony, and Interim Maintenance Child Custody and Custody Disputes Transfer Petitions & NRI Divorce Cases With years of experience in handling matrimonial disputes, Advocate Devashish Maharishi offers legal assistance in various courts in Delhi, including: Karkardooma Court Saket Court Patiala House Court Tis Hazari Court Rohini Court Dwarka Court Whether you'r...