Skip to main content

domestic violence case lawyer in delhi

Bombay High Court: In a criminal application regarding quashing of First Information Report, charging the husband and the in-laws under the provisions of cruelty, the Division Bench of Vibha Kankanwadi* and Sanjay A. Deshmukh, JJ., quashed the proceedings and held that when the relationship gets strained, exaggerations are made but such omnibus allegations if accepted as cruelty, would be an abuse of process of law. Background The applicant 1- husband and the respondent 2-wife got married on 24-3-2022. This was the second marriage of the wife and she had taken divorce with mutual consent from her first husband on 15-1-2013. The wife stated that about 1 to 1½ month she was treated properly and thereafter the dispute started. She contended that after few days of marriage she found the husband is not physically and mentally fit and this information was supressed from her before the marriage. Wife also contended that her in-laws made comments on her and gave insulting treatment. She also claimed that her husband demanded Rs. 15,00,000 for a purchase of flat. She was also not given medical treatment when she fell ill. It was alleged that the husband said that she was not suitable for his family and was finally driven out of house on 11-6-2023. Thus, she filed an FIR against her husband and the in-laws for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’). Aggrieved by the said FIR the petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (‘CrPC’) for quashing the criminal proceedings arising out of the said FIR. Analysis, Law and Decision The Court noted that the wife claimed that the husband raised doubt on her character and rested her from talking to other people. The Court pointed out that the chats between the couple which were made the part of the charge-sheet clearly talk about the medication that the husband was taking. The said chats were dated 13-1-2022 i.e. before the solemnization of the marriage. Thus, the allegation of wife regarding the suppression of illness of husband, holds no ground. The Court observed that the wife tried to state that there was no consummation of marriage while she herself admitted that she was treated properly for about 1 to 1½ month post marriage and does not anywhere state that there was no sexual intercourse between them during that period. The wife further alleged that the in-laws instigated her husband and they mentally harassed her.

The Court opined that cruelty has to be of grave nature, merely making annoying statements that the wife was not wearing proper clothes, was not able to cook food properly, cannot be said to be acts of grave cruelty or harassment as per the explanations given under the Section 498-A of IPC, especially when there is no other evidence except for the statements of the wife to corroborate such allegations. Accordingly, the Court quashed and set aside the criminal proceedings arising out of the FIR filed by the wife and held that when everything regarding the medication taken by the husband, was disclosed prior to the marriage and omnibus allegations were made, will not attract the provisions of cruelty contemplated under Section 498-A of the IPC. Additionally, it would be an abuse of process of law if the applicants had to face the trial in such circumstances. [Tushar Sampat Mane v. State of Maharashtra, Crl. App. No. 1380 of 2024, decided on: 8-8-2025.

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509


Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509


Best Divorce lawyer

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court

Best divorce lawyer in East delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court

Best divorce lawyer in Delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in new delhi

Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi


Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court

Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi

Mutual consent divorce lawyer

Best mutual divorce lawyer

Maintenance case lawyer

Domestic violence case lawyer

Contested divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi

Adultery divorce case lawyer in Delhi India

Transfer petition case lawyer

Best lawyer in delhi


Best advocate in delhi


Best advocate in karkardooma Court


Best advocate in patiala house court

Best advocate near me


Best lawyer near me

Top divorce case lawyer

Top maintenance case lawyer

Top domestic violence case lawyer

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi | Advocate Devashish Maharishi

✅ Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi | Advocate Devashish Maharishi Trusted Advocate for Divorce case, Domestic Violence case, Maintenance & Alimony case & NRI Mutual Consent Divorce case & other Family Disputes – Karkardooma Court, Delhi ⚖️ Real Judgment. Real Impact. Your Legal Rights Protected. In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) reaffirmed that a woman’s right to reside in a shared household is not dependent on her actual residence in it. This crucial decision strengthens women's rights under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 , particularly under Section 17(1) . 📌 Key Takeaway from the Judgment (ABC v. XYZ & Anr. – Neutral Citation: 2025:BHC-NAG:9202): “The right to reside in the shared household is a legal right, enforceable by a woman in a domestic relationship – regardless of whether she actually resided there in the past or not.” – Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke, Bombay High Court 🔍 Legal Analysis of...

Top Criminal, Divorce, Maintenance & Domestic Violence case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi

Top Criminal, Divorce, Maintenance & Domestic Violence case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi – Advocate Devashish Maharishi 📍 Serving clients across Karkardooma Court , East Delhi , South Delhi , West Delhi , North Delhi , Central Delhi , and Pan-India ⚖️ Facing a Matrimonial Dispute or Family Law Challenge? Whether you're seeking divorce , maintenance , alimony , or protection under domestic violence laws , Advocate Devashish Maharishi provides dedicated, experienced, and result-driven legal representation tailored to your needs. 🔍 Legal Services Offered ✅ Divorce Cases – Mutual or Contested Mutual Consent Divorce (Quick and Hassle-Free) Contested Divorce (Cruelty, Desertion, Adultery, etc.) NRI Divorce Proceedings Transfer Petitions Across Courts ✅ Maintenance & Alimony Cases Filing or Defending Section 125 CrPC Cases Interim Maintenance Orders Permanent Alimony Settlements Child Maintenance & Custody Execution & Recovery...