Skip to main content

Domestic violence case lawyer in Delhi

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi


Delhi High Court: The present petition was filed by the deceased’s father under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (‘CrPC’) read with Article 227 Constitution against the impugned order dated 3-4-2017 vide which the District and Sessions Judge upheld the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate (‘MM’) discharging Respondents 3 to 5 under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 of Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’). A Single Judge Bench of Neena Bansal Krishna J., finding no merit in the petition, dismissed it stating that merely because the deceased woman was crying, cannot per se make out any case of dowry harassment. The Court stated that there was nothing on record to even remotely suggest that there was any harassment of the deceased for fulfilling respondents’ demand for money. 

Background: The deceased’s father made a complaint of dowry harassment and death of his daughter vide FIR under Sections 498-A/304-B/34 of IPC. His daughter had married Respondent 3, as per Hindu rites and customs on 5-12-2010 and was blessed with 2 daughters aged 2.5 years and 40 days at the time of her demise. The deceased’s father submitted that he had spent about Rs 4 Lacs on her marriage, which was beyond his financial means, as he was an autorickshaw driver. He had arranged the money from his friends, relatives and family members. The deceased’s father submitted that after marriage, his daughter was continuously humiliated and tortured for not bringing sufficient dowry and demands of gold bracelet, bike and other articles were made from his daughter. He had been regularly meeting their demands. but she was continuously harassed and tortured. However, when the demands were not met, his daughter was mentally tortured because of which she died. On 3-4-2014 at about 11 pm, the deceased’s father received a call from the deceased’s father-in-law that the deceased had fallen unwell and had been taken to a hospital. The deceased’s father reached the hospital and was informed by the doctor that his daughter has died. Thus, a FIR was registered under Sections 304-B/498-A/34 of IPC. The MM vide order dated 27-6-2016 concluded that the allegations were vague and there were no specific instances or description of alleged demand for dowry or harassment. In the absence of specific allegations regarding harassment related to dowry demands or any willful conduct likely to drive the deceased to commit suicide or cause her grave injury, no case was held to be made out against Respondents 3 to 5, and they were discharged. The order of the MM was challenged and the District and Sessions Judge in the order dated 3-4-2017, concurred with the MM that there was no evidence to prima facie show the harassment of the deceased on account of dowry. Aggrieved by the said order, the present petition under Section 482 CrPC was filed.
resulted from cruelty by the in-laws. However, the District and Sessions Judge had already concluded that the death was due to natural causes, not dowry-related, and had accordingly discharged Respondents 3 to 5 under Section 304-B IPC. This discharge order was never challenged and hence could not be re-agitated now. The MM had rightly held that no offence under Section 498-A IPC was made out, which was upheld by the District and Sessions Judge. The Court thus found no merit in the present petition, dismissed it along with any pending applications. 


Gainda Lal v. State (NCT of Delhi), CS(COMM) 832 of 2025, decided on 13-8-2025.

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi


Best divorce lawyer

Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi 

Top divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi 

Maintenance case lawyer in karkarkardooma Court delhi

Domestic violence case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Transfer petition case lawyer

NRI mutual consent divorce case lawyer


Matrimonial dispute case lawyer

Lawyer for interim maintenance case in karkarkardooma Court delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in East delhi



Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509


Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509


Best Divorce lawyer

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court

Best divorce lawyer in East delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court

Best divorce lawyer in Delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in new delhi

Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi


Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court

Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi

Mutual consent divorce lawyer

Best mutual divorce lawyer

Maintenance case lawyer

Domestic violence case lawyer

Contested divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi

Adultery divorce case lawyer in Delhi India

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer

Best Divorce & Criminal Lawyer in Delhi

📌 Supreme Court Reiterates: Hostile Testimony Cannot Be Rejected Entirely | Best Divorce & Criminal Lawyer in Delhi The Supreme Court, in DADU @ Ankush & Anr. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh , has reaffirmed that the testimony of a hostile witness cannot be rejected completely . Courts must evaluate the consistent portions of evidence that support either the prosecution or the defence. This ruling highlights how crucial expert cross-examination, evidence assessment, and courtroom strategy are in criminal trials. If you are facing criminal charges, false allegations, domestic violence cases, divorce proceedings, or family disputes , having the best criminal lawyer in Delhi  or an experienced divorce lawyer in Delhi is vital for protecting your rights. ⚖️ Why Choose Us? We provide professional, strategic, and result-oriented legal representation in: ✔️ Criminal Defence Cases ✔️ Divorce & Matrimonial Cases ✔️ Domestic Violence (DV) Matters ✔️ Child Custody & M...

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi | Advocate Devashish Maharishi

✅ Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi | Advocate Devashish Maharishi Trusted Advocate for Divorce case, Domestic Violence case, Maintenance & Alimony case & NRI Mutual Consent Divorce case & other Family Disputes – Karkardooma Court, Delhi ⚖️ Real Judgment. Real Impact. Your Legal Rights Protected. In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) reaffirmed that a woman’s right to reside in a shared household is not dependent on her actual residence in it. This crucial decision strengthens women's rights under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 , particularly under Section 17(1) . 📌 Key Takeaway from the Judgment (ABC v. XYZ & Anr. – Neutral Citation: 2025:BHC-NAG:9202): “The right to reside in the shared household is a legal right, enforceable by a woman in a domestic relationship – regardless of whether she actually resided there in the past or not.” – Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke, Bombay High Court 🔍 Legal Analysis of...