Skip to main content

Best Divorce Lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court DelhiAdvocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court DelhiAdvocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court DelhiAdvocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court DelhiAdvocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi



The Patna High Court has held that before passing a final order of maintenance, Family Courts are under a statutory obligation to direct parties to file affidavits of assets and liabilities and that only after considering such affidavits can the status of the parties, their assets, needs, and earning capacities be evaluated to determine the appropriate amount of maintenance. The High Court was hearing a criminal revision petition filed by a husband challenging an order of the Family Court, which had directed him to pay monthly maintenance of ₹20,000 to his wife, arguing that the order was passed mechanically, without properly assessing his financial capacity, and in disregard of binding directions requiring affidavits of disclosure.

A Single Judge Bench of Justice Bibek Chaudhuri, while deciding the matter, observed that “…Before passing a final order of maintenance, the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Saran at Chapra is under statutory obligation to direct the parties to file affidavits of assets and liabilities. Only on due consideration of such affidavits of assets and liabilities, it will be possible for the Court to consider the status of the parties, their assets, respective needs, capability of earning and on the basis of such documents, Court can come to a conclusive decision with regard to amount of maintenance.”
The Patna High Court observed that the Family Court had overlooked directions laid down by the Supreme Court in Rajnish v. Neha (2021), which mandated filing affidavits of assets and liabilities in maintenance proceedings. The Bench underscored that affidavits of disclosure are essential to prevent suppression of material facts and to ensure a transparent assessment of the financial position of both parties. The Court further observed that such affidavits enable the Family Court to evaluate the earning capacity, needs, and lifestyle of the parties and to pass a reasoned order based on real circumstances rather than assumptions. It was therefore observed that the order passed by the Family Court had been rendered unsustainable as it was made without complying with this statutory requirement and without addressing the objections raised by the petitioner.
In view of such circumstances, this Court does not have any other alternative but to hold that the impugned order suffers from impropriety and illegality in over looking suppression of material facts, income of the parties, their source of income, their assets and liabilities and other similar factors, which are required to be considered for determination of maintenance allowance", the Court concluded. Conclusion The Bench set aside the order of the Family Court and directed both parties to file affidavits of assets and liabilities. It further instructed the Family Court to reconsider the matter afresh based on these affidavits and decide the application for maintenance within four weeks thereafter. 

Cause Title: Ravi Prakash Saxena v. Priyanka Rani

Best divorce lawyer

Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi 

Top divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi 

Maintenance case lawyer in karkarkardooma Court delhi

Domestic violence case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Transfer petition case lawyer

NRI mutual consent divorce case lawyer


Matrimonial dispute case lawyer

Lawyer for interim maintenance case in karkarkardooma Court delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in East delhi


Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509


Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509


Best Divorce lawyer

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court

Best divorce lawyer in East delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court

Best divorce lawyer in Delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in new delhi

Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi


Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court

Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi

Mutual consent divorce lawyer

Best mutual divorce lawyer

Maintenance case lawyer

Domestic violence case lawyer

Contested divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi

Adultery divorce case lawyer in Delhi India

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi | Advocate Devashish Maharishi

✅ Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi | Advocate Devashish Maharishi Trusted Advocate for Divorce case, Domestic Violence case, Maintenance & Alimony case & NRI Mutual Consent Divorce case & other Family Disputes – Karkardooma Court, Delhi ⚖️ Real Judgment. Real Impact. Your Legal Rights Protected. In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) reaffirmed that a woman’s right to reside in a shared household is not dependent on her actual residence in it. This crucial decision strengthens women's rights under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 , particularly under Section 17(1) . 📌 Key Takeaway from the Judgment (ABC v. XYZ & Anr. – Neutral Citation: 2025:BHC-NAG:9202): “The right to reside in the shared household is a legal right, enforceable by a woman in a domestic relationship – regardless of whether she actually resided there in the past or not.” – Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke, Bombay High Court 🔍 Legal Analysis of...

Top Criminal, Divorce, Maintenance & Domestic Violence case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi

Top Criminal, Divorce, Maintenance & Domestic Violence case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi – Advocate Devashish Maharishi 📍 Serving clients across Karkardooma Court , East Delhi , South Delhi , West Delhi , North Delhi , Central Delhi , and Pan-India ⚖️ Facing a Matrimonial Dispute or Family Law Challenge? Whether you're seeking divorce , maintenance , alimony , or protection under domestic violence laws , Advocate Devashish Maharishi provides dedicated, experienced, and result-driven legal representation tailored to your needs. 🔍 Legal Services Offered ✅ Divorce Cases – Mutual or Contested Mutual Consent Divorce (Quick and Hassle-Free) Contested Divorce (Cruelty, Desertion, Adultery, etc.) NRI Divorce Proceedings Transfer Petitions Across Courts ✅ Maintenance & Alimony Cases Filing or Defending Section 125 CrPC Cases Interim Maintenance Orders Permanent Alimony Settlements Child Maintenance & Custody Execution & Recovery...