Himachal Pradesh High Court Judgment
Failure to prove financial capacity can rebut S.139 presump-tion.
Dishonour of cheque N. I. Act - S.138, 139 & 118(a) Financial capacity of complainant. Where the complain-ant failed to establish her financial capacity to advance the al-leged loan and material inconsistencies emerged regarding prior cheque-bounce litigation by her husband against the same accused, the presumption under Ss.118 & 139 stood ef-fectively rebutted. In the absence of credible proof of ad-vancement of the loan, the benefit of doubt was rightly ex-tended and the accused was entitled to acquittal.
वित्तीय क्षमता नहीं, तो S.138 नहीं सिर्फ चेक काफी नहीं, ऋण साबित करना ज़रूरी अविश्वसनीय कहानी = आरोपी बरी Pre-sumption तब तक ही, जब तक क्षमता सिद्ध हो
Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
Top lawyer for Contested Divorce case, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Domestic violence case, CAW cell Complaint case, Quashing petition and for Mutual Consent Divorce case in Delhi
📞 Need Legal Help?
If you're facing domestic abuse or going through a complex matrimonial dispute, I’m here to help. I offer consultations for:
✅ Mutual or contested divorce case
✅ Domestic violence protection
✅ Maintenance case, Alimony case Or Interim maintenance and custody
✅ Transfer petitions and NRI divorce matters
✅ Cheque Bounce case
✅ Criminal case
📍 Office: 137, J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, 110092
📞 Contact: 8595722509
Comments
Post a Comment