Skip to main content

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi

Orissa High Court: Second Wife Not Entitled to Family Pension Under Odisha Civil Services Pension Rules, 1992

Bigamous Marriage Declared Void – No Family Pension Rights

In a significant judgment, the Orissa High Court has categorically held that a second wife, whose marriage was contracted during the subsistence of the first marriage, is not entitled to family pension under the Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992.

The Division Bench comprising Justice Dixit Krishna Shripad and Justice Chittaranjan Dash reiterated that only a legally wedded wife can claim family pension, and a marriage that is void ab initio cannot be validated by any subsequent event.


Case Title & Citation

Kankalata Dwibedi v. State of Orissa
W.A. No. 1460 of 2025
Decided on: 13 January 2026
Orissa High Court


Background of the Case

The dispute arose after the competent authority rejected the claim of the appellant for family pension vide order dated 12-11-2021. The rejection was based on the finding that:

  • The deceased government employee had contracted a second marriage during the lifetime of his first wife.

  • As per Note below Clause (d) of Rule 6(6) of the Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, the second wife was not legally entitled to pensionary benefits.

Appellant’s Argument

The appellant contended that:

  • The Pension Rules use the term “wife/wives”, which should be interpreted to include the second wife.

  • After the death of the first wife, the second wife should be considered eligible for family pension.

Respondents’ Stand

The State opposed the claim, asserting that:

  • Bigamous marriage is void under Hindu law

  • Pension cannot be granted on the basis of an illegal marital relationship


Key Legal Findings of the Orissa High Court

1. Monogamy Is Mandatory Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

The Court emphasized that after the enactment of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, monogamy is the rule, and bigamy is strictly prohibited.

“The idea of second marriage during the subsistence of the first abhors the very pith and substance of the Act.”


2. Bigamous Marriage Is Void and Punishable

Relying on Section 17 of the Hindu Marriage Act read with Sections 494 and 495 IPC, the Court reiterated that:

  • A second marriage during the subsistence of the first is void ab initio

  • Such an act constitutes a criminal offence

The Court also referred to Mayne’s Hindu Law, which clearly declares bigamous marriages as illegal.


3. Valid Marriage Is a Sine Qua Non for Family Pension

The Court clarified that:

  • Family pension is payable only to a “widow”

  • To be considered a widow, there must exist a valid and lawful marriage

  • What is void from inception does not become valid later

Granting family pension to a second wife would amount to placing a premium on illegality, which the Court firmly rejected.


4. Interpretation of “Wife/Wives” in Pension Rules

The Bench held that:

  • The word “wives” in the Pension Rules does not permit polygamy

  • It cannot be interpreted to override personal law and statutory prohibitions


5. Reliance on Supreme Court & High Court Precedents

The Court relied on Mahalakshmamma v. Department of Rural Development & Panchayathraj, 2023 SCC OnLine Kar 100, holding that:

Recognition of second marriages during the subsistence of the first marriage is detrimental to public interest and encourages illegal conduct by government employees.


Final Decision

The Orissa High Court dismissed the writ appeal, holding that the appellant (second wife) is not entitled to family pension, as the marriage itself was void in law.


Legal Takeaway

✔ Second marriage during subsistence of first marriage is illegal
✔ Bigamous wife has no right to family pension
✔ Pension benefits cannot arise from void marriages
✔ Hindu Marriage Act overrides service rules



  • Orissa High Court family pension judgment

  • Second wife family pension eligibility

  • Bigamous marriage pension rights India

  • Hindu Marriage Act Section 17 bigamy

  • Odisha Civil Services Pension Rules

  • Family pension second wife Supreme Court

  • Void marriage pension entitlement

  • Bigamy under IPC Sections 494 and 495

  • Family pension legal wife only


Need Expert Legal Help in Matrimonial & Divorce Matters?

Advocate Devashish Maharishi
⭐ Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi

Legal Services Offered:

✅ Mutual & Contested Divorce
✅ Domestic Violence Cases
✅ Maintenance & Alimony
✅ Interim Maintenance & Child Custody
✅ Restitution of Conjugal Rights
✅ CAW Cell Complaints
✅ Quashing of FIRs
✅ NRI Divorce & Transfer Petitions

📍 Office Address:
137, J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi – 110092

📞 Contact: 8595722509

📢 If you are facing domestic abuse or complex matrimonial disputes, get trusted legal guidance today. Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi | Advocate Devashish Maharishi

✅ Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi | Advocate Devashish Maharishi Trusted Advocate for Divorce case, Domestic Violence case, Maintenance & Alimony case & NRI Mutual Consent Divorce case & other Family Disputes – Karkardooma Court, Delhi ⚖️ Real Judgment. Real Impact. Your Legal Rights Protected. In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) reaffirmed that a woman’s right to reside in a shared household is not dependent on her actual residence in it. This crucial decision strengthens women's rights under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 , particularly under Section 17(1) . 📌 Key Takeaway from the Judgment (ABC v. XYZ & Anr. – Neutral Citation: 2025:BHC-NAG:9202): “The right to reside in the shared household is a legal right, enforceable by a woman in a domestic relationship – regardless of whether she actually resided there in the past or not.” – Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke, Bombay High Court 🔍 Legal Analysis of...

Top Criminal, Divorce, Maintenance & Domestic Violence case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi

Top Criminal, Divorce, Maintenance & Domestic Violence case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi – Advocate Devashish Maharishi 📍 Serving clients across Karkardooma Court , East Delhi , South Delhi , West Delhi , North Delhi , Central Delhi , and Pan-India ⚖️ Facing a Matrimonial Dispute or Family Law Challenge? Whether you're seeking divorce , maintenance , alimony , or protection under domestic violence laws , Advocate Devashish Maharishi provides dedicated, experienced, and result-driven legal representation tailored to your needs. 🔍 Legal Services Offered ✅ Divorce Cases – Mutual or Contested Mutual Consent Divorce (Quick and Hassle-Free) Contested Divorce (Cruelty, Desertion, Adultery, etc.) NRI Divorce Proceedings Transfer Petitions Across Courts ✅ Maintenance & Alimony Cases Filing or Defending Section 125 CrPC Cases Interim Maintenance Orders Permanent Alimony Settlements Child Maintenance & Custody Execution & Recovery...