Skip to main content

Posts

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi

📌  Delhi High Court on Child Custody & Parental Alienation In a significant ruling, the  Delhi High Court  upheld the  Family Court’s decision granting custody of two minor children to the father , rejecting the mother’s appeal in a long-running matrimonial and custody dispute. ⚖️  Key Takeaways from the Judgment ✔️  Child’s welfare is paramount  – overrides parental entitlement ✔️  Tender years doctrine questioned  as outdated and stereotypical ✔️  Parental alienation strongly deprecated ✔️  Child’s preference not decisive  if influenced by alienation ✔️  Siblings should not be separated ✔️ Custody ≠ end of motherhood –  shared parental responsibility continues 🧠 The Court observed that  custody cannot be claimed as a fait accompli by excluding the other parent , and allegations of abuse raised belatedly without evidence cannot dictate custody outcomes. 👨‍⚖️  Bench:  Justice Anil Kshetarpal ...

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Top lawyer for Contested Divorce case, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Domestic violence case, CAW cell Complaint case, Quashing petition and for Mutual Consent Divorce case in Delhi 📞 Need Legal Help? If you're facing domestic abuse or going through a complex matrimonial dispute, I’m here to help. I offer consultations for: ✅ Mutual or contested divorce case ✅ Domestic violence protection ✅ Maintenance case, Alimony case Or Interim maintenance and custody ✅ Transfer petitions and NRI divorce matters 📍 Office: 137, J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, 110092 📞 Contact: 8595722509

Mutual Consent Divorce Lawyer in Delhi

Recently, a Delhi court examined the scope and object of interim maintenance under the criminal procedure law in a matrimonial dispute that raised significant questions about financial support, earning capacity, and the right of a wife to live with dignity after separation. The case involved competing claims regarding income, standard of living during marriage, and the extent of a husband’s statutory responsibility, particularly when he resides abroad. The case arose from an application filed by the wife seeking interim maintenance under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). She claimed that following her separation from her husband, she was unable to maintain herself and had become dependent on her family for daily expenses. According to her, she had enjoyed a particular standard of living during the marriage, which could not be abruptly taken away after separation. The husband opposed the claim, asserting that the marriage had lasted only about 13 months and t...

Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi

Jharkhand High Court Grants Divorce Over Digital Cruelty & Character Assassination  ⚖️ Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi  In a landmark judgment, the Jharkhand High Court granted divorce to a woman who faced mental cruelty and humiliation after her husband illegally accessed and shared her private photographs from Google Drive with his family. The Division Bench of Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad and Justice Arun Kumar Rai held that sharing such “objectionable” photos and allowing humiliation by in-laws amounts to character assassination and marital cruelty. 🔹 Court recognizes  digital privacy violation 🔹 Sharing private photos =  mental cruelty 🔹 Strong message against character shaming of women 🔹 Important precedent in Indian matrimonial law Top lawyer for Contested Divorce case, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Domestic violence case, CAW cell Complaint case, Quashing petition and for Mutual Consent Divorce case...

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi

Orissa High Court: Second Wife Not Entitled to Family Pension Under Odisha Civil Services Pension Rules, 1992 Bigamous Marriage Declared Void – No Family Pension Rights In a significant judgment, the Orissa High Court has categorically held that a second wife , whose marriage was contracted during the subsistence of the first marriage , is not entitled to family pension under the Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 . The Division Bench comprising Justice Dixit Krishna Shripad and Justice Chittaranjan Dash reiterated that only a legally wedded wife can claim family pension, and a marriage that is void ab initio cannot be validated by any subsequent event. Case Title & Citation Kankalata Dwibedi v. State of Orissa W.A. No. 1460 of 2025 Decided on: 13 January 2026 Orissa High Court Background of the Case The dispute arose after the competent authority rejected the claim of the appellant for family pension vide order dated 12-11-2021 . The rejection was based ...

Divorce Over Digital Cruelty & Character Assassination | Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi

Jharkhand High Court Grants Divorce Over Digital Cruelty & Character Assassination ⚖️📱 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi  In a landmark judgment, the Jharkhand High Court granted divorce to a woman who faced mental cruelty and humiliation after her husband illegally accessed and shared her private photographs from Google Drive with his family. The Division Bench of Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad and Justice Arun Kumar Rai held that sharing such “objectionable” photos and allowing humiliation by in-laws amounts to character assassination and marital cruelty. 🔹 Court recognizes digital privacy violation 🔹 Sharing private photos = mental cruelty 🔹 Strong message against character shaming of women 🔹 Important precedent in Indian matrimonial law 📌 Watch to know how courts are protecting women’s dignity, privacy, and rights in the digital age. # divorce #DivorceJudgment #MentalCruelty #DigitalPrivacy #IndianJudiciary WomensRights ...

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi

Delhi High Court Enhances Interim Maintenance | Wife Cannot Be Presumed Earning Without Proof The  Delhi High Court , in a significant ruling, has held that  a wife cannot be presumed to be earning or capable of maintaining herself at the interim maintenance stage unless there is clear evidence . Mere allegations by the husband, without documentary proof, are insufficient. 👩‍⚖️  Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma , while hearing  CRL.REV.P. 763/202 (X v. Y)  on  06 January 2026 , enhanced the interim maintenance awarded to the wife from  ₹2,500 to ₹3,500 per month  under  Section 125 Cr.P.C. 🔑 Key Observations by the Court: A  bald assertion  that the wife is working cannot be accepted without  prima facie evidence . The wife had studied only up to  Class 11 , and there was  no proof  that she was employed as a nursery teacher. The husband, despite being a  graduate , claimed an income  lower than minimum w...

Top Divorce Lawyer in Delhi

⚖️ Legal Update | Telangana High Court on Mental Cruelty in Divorce “Normal wear and tear of married life is not mental cruelty.” — Telangana High Court The Telangana High Court has ruled that routine marital disputes, work schedules of a working wife, or family interference do NOT amount to mental cruelty under divorce law. 🔹 Filing of Section 498A IPC alone is not cruelty 🔹 A working wife cannot be blamed for household imbalance 🔹 Mental cruelty must be serious, continuous, and proven Facing a contested divorce, Domestic violence case, Maintenance case, Criminal case or false cruelty allegations ? Get experienced legal guidance from a trusted family court lawyer. 👨‍⚖️ Advocate Devashish Maharishi 📍 Karkardooma Court | East Delhi | Anand Vihar | Shahdara | Laxmi Nagar | New Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Karkardooma Court | Matrimonial lawyer East Delhi | Maintenance case lawyer | Domestic violence case lawyer | Interim maintenance | Transfer Petition | Child Custo...

Best Divorce Lawyer in Delhi

Delhi High Court: Wife Cannot Be Denied Interim Maintenance on Mere Allegations of Earning The Delhi High Court has reaffirmed that at the stage of interim maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C., a wife cannot be presumed to be earning or self-sufficient based on vague and unsubstantiated claims made by the husband . In CRL.REV.P. 763/2024 (A vs. B) , the Court enhanced interim maintenance from ₹2,500 to ₹3,500 per month , holding that: ✔ Bald allegations about the wife’s employment, without documentary proof, carry no weight ✔ A wife’s statutory right to maintenance cannot be diluted by assumptions ✔ Where the husband conceals or gives incomplete income details, income can be assessed on minimum wages ✔ Interim maintenance must meet basic survival needs The Court emphasized that a woman educated only up to the 11th standard cannot be presumed capable of maintaining herself , especially in the absence of evidence. 👩‍⚖️ Bench: Hon’ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma 📌 Court...

Best Divorce & Domestic Violence case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi

Delhi High Court Judgment on Daughter-in-Law Eviction Senior Citizens’ Right to Peaceful Living Prevails | DV Act Case 🏛️ Delhi High Court | Karkardooma Court | Delhi District Courts Best Divorce & Domestic Violence Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi Expert Family Law Advocate for Delhi District Courts Serving Karkardooma Court, East Delhi & All Delhi Courts Trusted Family & Matrimonial Lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi If you are searching for a divorce lawyer in Karkardooma Court , a domestic violence advocate in East Delhi , or a family law expert for Delhi District Courts , you are at the right place. Delhi High Court DV Act Judgment | Senior Citizens Eviction Case | Lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi Delhi High Court holds that a daughter-in-law’s right of residence under the Domestic Violence Act is not absolute and cannot override senior citizens’ right to live peacefully in their self-acquired property. Expert DV Act lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi. Di...

Divorce on ground of Cruelty

Telangana High Court: Working Wife’s Schedule Not Mental Cruelty – Divorce Appeal Rejected “Normal wear and tear of married life is not cruelty” – Telangana High Court In a significant judgment, the  Telangana High Court  has reaffirmed that  ordinary matrimonial disputes, work schedules of a wife, or family interference do not amount to mental cruelty  under matrimonial law. A  Division Bench of Justices Moushumi Bhattacharya and Nagesh Bheemapaka  dismissed an appeal filed by a husband challenging the Family Court’s refusal to grant divorce on grounds of mental cruelty. Key Observations by the Court The High Court relied on settled  Supreme Court precedents  and observed: “Mere trivial irritations, quarrels, and normal wear and tear of married life, which happen in day-to-day life, would not be adequate for grant of divorce on the ground of mental cruelty.” Case Background Marriage solemnised in  May 2015 Couple living separately since...

Best Divorce Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi

Advocate Devashish Maharishi – Best Divorce Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi  is a trusted and experienced  divorce and matrimonial lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi , providing expert legal services in contested divorce, mutual consent divorce, domestic violence cases, maintenance, alimony, and CAW Cell matters. With a strong presence in  East Delhi courts , he is known for strategic representation and client-focused legal solutions. If you are facing marital disputes, domestic abuse, or family law issues, Advocate Devashish Maharishi offers professional legal guidance with confidentiality and dedication. Top Matrimonial & Divorce Lawyer in East Delhi Advocate Devashish Maharishi specializes in  family and matrimonial law cases in Delhi , including: Contested Divorce Cases in Karkardooma Court Mutual Consent Divorce Lawyer in Delhi Domestic Violence Act (DV Act) Cases Restitution of Conjugal Rights (RCR) Maintenance & Alimony ...

Maintenance and Alimony case Lawyer in Delhi

Delhi High Court Reaffirms Father’s Legal Duty to Maintain Minor Children Interim Maintenance Reduced to ₹25,000 for Three Children | CRL.REV.P. 723/2024 In a significant judgment strengthening the rights of minor children, the Delhi High Court has reaffirmed that the obligation to maintain children is not merely statutory but also a legal, moral, and social responsibility of both parents . The ruling was delivered by Justice Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma in A v. B, CRL.REV.P. 723/2024 , decided on 27 December 2025 , while hearing a criminal revision petition challenging an interim maintenance order passed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 . Key Highlights of the Delhi High Court Judgment The Court upheld the father’s obligation to pay maintenance for three minor children Interim maintenance was modified from ₹30,000 to ₹25,000 per month Maintenance applies collectively to all three children The Court rejected the husband’s claim of earning only ₹9,000 per m...

Best Divorce Lawyer in Delhi

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi – Advocate Devashish Maharishi When it comes to sensitive matrimonial disputes, choosing the best divorce case lawyer in Delhi can make a crucial difference in the outcome of your case. Whether you are facing a contested divorce, domestic violence issues, or seeking mutual consent divorce, Advocate Devashish Maharishi provides strategic, compassionate, and result-oriented legal representation at Karkardooma Court, Delhi . With extensive experience in matrimonial and family law matters, Advocate Devashish Maharishi is known for handling complex divorce cases with professionalism and confidentiality. Why Choose Advocate Devashish Maharishi – Divorce Lawyer in Delhi? Finding the right divorce advocate is essential when your personal, financial, and emotional future is at stake. Advocate Devashish Maharishi is widely trusted for: ✔ Strong representation in Karkardooma Court & Delhi District Courts ✔ Expertise in contested and mutual consen...

Finality of Legal Proceedings Explained: Delhi High Court Judgment & Expert Advice from Leading Delhi Advocate

⚖️ Delhi High Court Reaffirms Finality of Legal Proceedings – Get Strategic Legal Representation in Delhi NCR The  Delhi High Court , in  MMTC Ltd. v. Anglo American Metallurgical Pty. Ltd. (24 December 2025) , has strongly reiterated that  once a dispute is conclusively decided by a competent forum, it cannot be reopened through abuse of legal process . The Court held that  civil suits alleging fraud cannot be used to invalidate finalized arbitral awards , especially after affirmation by the  Supreme Court of India . This judgment highlights an important legal principle: 👉  Timely, well-planned litigation strategy is crucial. Failure to raise appropriate grounds at the correct stage can permanently close legal remedies. Whether it is  commercial litigation, civil disputes, or matrimonial cases , courts increasingly discourage frivolous or delayed proceedings. 👨‍⚖️ Advocate Devashish Maharishi – Trusted Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi If you are s...