Skip to main content

Best Maintenance case lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi


Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi


Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi


The Supreme Court on Friday (Aug. 29) issued a notice in a plea filed by a man against the maintainability of the Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance application filed by his live-in-partner before the family court. The bench comprising Justices Pankaj Mithal and Prasanna B. Varale heard the plea filed by the male partner against the Kerala High Court's decision that dismissed his plea questioning the maintainability of a Section 125 CrPC maintenance plea before the family court.

Dismissing the challenge to maintenance proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C., the High Court said: “The definite case of the respondent is that, she and the petitioner have been living as husband and wife right from 2005. It is settled that Section 125 of Cr.P.C being a beneficial legislation, to maintain a claim under the said provision, strict proof of marriage is not required. Where parties cohabited for long period of years, presumption is in favour of marriage. If it is established that parties lived together as husband and wife for long period, the maintenance cannot be denied.”
Before the Supreme Court, the Petitioner argued that in a live-in relationship, the partner is not entitled to any maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and therefore, entire proceedings are completely misleading and not maintainable. After hearing the petitioner, the court was inclined to issue a notice to the Respondent to be returnable within six weeks. Notably, in Lalita Toppo v. State of Jharkhand (2015), the bench led by Justice TS Thakur (as he then was) referred three questions to a larger bench, amongst them one question was “Whether the living together of a man and woman as husband and wife for a considerable period of time would raise the presumption of a valid marriage between them and whether such a presumption would entitle the woman to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC?”

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509


Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi
+91 85957 22509


Best Divorce lawyer

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court

Best divorce lawyer in East delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court

Best divorce lawyer in Delhi

Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in new delhi

Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi

Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi


Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court

Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi

Mutual consent divorce lawyer

Best mutual divorce lawyer

Maintenance case lawyer

Domestic violence case lawyer

Contested divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi

Adultery divorce case lawyer in Delhi India




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer
Post a Comment
Read more

When is an Offence Murder Or attempt to Murder in Delayed Death

Supreme Court Clarifies Murder vs. Attempt to Murder in Delayed Death: Key Takeaways from Maniklal Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh Criminal Appeal No. 5578 of 2024, Judgment Dated September 12, 2025 In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court has clarified the distinction between murder under Section 302 and attempt to murder under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) , specifically in cases where the death occurs long after the original assault due to medical complications like septicemia. The ruling came from the recent Maniklal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh case , which sheds new light on how courts should treat delayed deaths caused by the injuries inflicted in an assault. Key Facts: The case involved the conviction of Maniklal Sahu and three co-accused for the murder of Rekhchand Verma. Rekhchand was assaulted by the accused on February 22, 2022, and suffered severe injuries. He survived for about nine months but eventually died on November 8, 2022, due to septicemia and pneum...
Post a Comment
Read more

Legal Expert for Divorce, Maintenance, and Domestic Violence Cases in Delhi Courts

Legal Expert for Divorce, Maintenance, and Domestic Violence Cases in Delhi Courts Are you facing domestic abuse or navigating a complex matrimonial dispute ? Do you need a professional advocate to handle maintenance cases, alimony , interim maintenance , or custody issues? If so, you need the expertise of an experienced family law attorney who can provide strong representation in family courts across Delhi . Advocate Devashish Maharishi is one of the leading divorce and family law lawyers practicing in Delhi, with a focus on cases related to: Divorce (Mutual and Contested) Domestic Violence Protection Maintenance, Alimony, and Interim Maintenance Child Custody and Custody Disputes Transfer Petitions & NRI Divorce Cases With years of experience in handling matrimonial disputes, Advocate Devashish Maharishi offers legal assistance in various courts in Delhi, including: Karkardooma Court Saket Court Patiala House Court Tis Hazari Court Rohini Court Dwarka Court Whether you'r...
Post a Comment
Read more