Skip to main content

Top Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi

Delhi High Court Orders Criminal Complaint in Fortis–Walmark Arbitration Dispute

The Delhi High Court has reaffirmed that no prior hearing is mandatory under Section 340 CrPC (now Section 379 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) before directing the filing of a criminal complaint.

In a major development, Justice Amit Bansal ordered prosecution in the Fortis Healthcare v. Walmark Holdings dispute after finding that Walmark relied on an allegedly forged term sheet to seek interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

🔍 The Court held that:

  • The disputed term sheet was never executed by Fortis

  • It did not bear the authentic signature of Fortis’s then CEO

  • Walmark officials were aware of this fact while approaching the Court

Relying on Pritish v. State of Maharashtra (2002), the Court reiterated that Section 340 CrPC does not require a preliminary inquiry or hearing of the accused before filing a complaint.

📄 The Registrar General has now been directed to lodge a criminal complaint and forward all records to the concerned Magistrate.

⚖️ Case: Walmark Holdings Ltd. v. Fortis Healthcare Ltd.
📚 Neutral Citation: 2026:DHC:515


🔑 Key Legal Takeaway

Courts will not hesitate to invoke Section 340 CrPC / Section 379 BNSS where deliberate falsehoods and forged documents are used to obtain judicial relief.


Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi


Top lawyer for Contested Divorce case, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Domestic violence case, CAW cell Complaint case, Quashing petition and for Mutual Consent Divorce case in Delhi


📞 Need Legal Help?


If you're facing domestic abuse or going through a complex matrimonial dispute, I’m here to help. I offer consultations for:


✅ Mutual or contested divorce case


✅ Domestic violence protection


✅ Maintenance case, Alimony case Or Interim maintenance and custody


✅ Transfer petitions and NRI divorce matters



📍 Office: 137, J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, 110092


📞 Contact: 8595722509

#DelhiHighCourt #Section340CrPC #BNSS2023 #ArbitrationLaw #FortisHealthcare #Walmark #Perjury #FalseAffidavit #IndianJudiciary #LegalNews #ArbitrationDispute #ForgedDocuments #Section9Arbitration #LawInstagram #LawFacebook



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer

Best Divorce & Criminal Lawyer in Delhi

📌 Supreme Court Reiterates: Hostile Testimony Cannot Be Rejected Entirely | Best Divorce & Criminal Lawyer in Delhi The Supreme Court, in DADU @ Ankush & Anr. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh , has reaffirmed that the testimony of a hostile witness cannot be rejected completely . Courts must evaluate the consistent portions of evidence that support either the prosecution or the defence. This ruling highlights how crucial expert cross-examination, evidence assessment, and courtroom strategy are in criminal trials. If you are facing criminal charges, false allegations, domestic violence cases, divorce proceedings, or family disputes , having the best criminal lawyer in Delhi  or an experienced divorce lawyer in Delhi is vital for protecting your rights. ⚖️ Why Choose Us? We provide professional, strategic, and result-oriented legal representation in: ✔️ Criminal Defence Cases ✔️ Divorce & Matrimonial Cases ✔️ Domestic Violence (DV) Matters ✔️ Child Custody & M...

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi | Advocate Devashish Maharishi

✅ Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi | Advocate Devashish Maharishi Trusted Advocate for Divorce case, Domestic Violence case, Maintenance & Alimony case & NRI Mutual Consent Divorce case & other Family Disputes – Karkardooma Court, Delhi ⚖️ Real Judgment. Real Impact. Your Legal Rights Protected. In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) reaffirmed that a woman’s right to reside in a shared household is not dependent on her actual residence in it. This crucial decision strengthens women's rights under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 , particularly under Section 17(1) . 📌 Key Takeaway from the Judgment (ABC v. XYZ & Anr. – Neutral Citation: 2025:BHC-NAG:9202): “The right to reside in the shared household is a legal right, enforceable by a woman in a domestic relationship – regardless of whether she actually resided there in the past or not.” – Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke, Bombay High Court 🔍 Legal Analysis of...