Best Divorce Lawyer Contact Number 8595722509

The Allahabad High Court recently observed that marriage is an institution of great social relevance, and it gets adversely affected when criminal complaints are lodged in the heat of the moment over trivial matrimonial issues without proper deliberations. A bench of Justice Vikram D. Chauhan added that when such a complaint is filed, the parties do not properly visualise the implications and consequences, which can lead to insurmountable harassment, agony, and pain not just for the complainant, accused, and their close relatives but also for the marriage as an institution. Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 21671 of 2025 Applicant :- Shariq Mian And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91...

Divorce case lawyer in Surajmal Vihar Delhi Are you suffering because of your unsuccessful married life and want to break away from such marriage? Then contact Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi   The well-known and most trusted divorce case lawyer in Surajmal Vihar, Anand vihar,shahdara, East delhi,central delhi, new delhi to get divorce in hassle free manner and for rendering favorable solution to the clients. He guides the clients for all the legal documentation process of filing/ defending the divorce case and makes it favorable to the clients for best possible result. Call us to get expert legal advice in quick way

Is your Married life going through bad phase and there is no chance of improvement and are you seeking for legal advice? Then hire the best mutual consent divorce lawyer in Shahdara, Preet vihar,Mayur vihar, anand vihar, rishabh vihar, jhilmil, IP extension East Delhi for filing divorce. Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi is top rated mutual consent divorce lawyer in Delhi. He is well known for filing contested/ mutual consent divorce and drafting divorce. He guides the whole process and its related consequences and undertakes all kinds of litigation pertaining to the divorce. For filing/ defending divorce case with success in peaceful manner contact us.

Get right and effective advice from well experienced and professional divorce case lawyer for critical legal solution for your divorce related issue. Advocate Devashish Maharishi | best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi.  He is well known for his ethical and responsible dealing in any kind of divorce cases whether its with mutual consent or contested divorce. He handles the cases carefully and present the divorce petition before the court with complete documentation. Call us to get proper guidance for your case.

Advocate Devashish Maharishi is the best lawyer for maintenance/ alimony, contested divorce case, domestic violence case, NRI mutual consent divorce case in karkardooma Court East Delhi.  We offer an Outstanding & effective legal services to fulfil all your Legal needs. Firstly we counsels the client after listening to the opinions of both parties for solving the circumstances with compromise in order to amicably settle the dispute in positive manner. We guides clients for all the process and consequences. By using his knowledge of family law, we files the case with proper documentation process for positive result. Call us for hiring. Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi. 

A v. B, MAT.APP.(F.C.) 160 of 2025, decided on 1-7-2025. Delhi High Court: In an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 challenging the decree of divorce passed under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (‘HMA’) by the Principal Judge, Family Courts, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (‘Family Court’), the Division Bench of Renu Bhatnagar* and Navin Chawla JJ., stated that the complaints made by wife to her husband’s employer, especially those involving unsubstantiated claims of adultery, could not be treated to address the issues of any wrong done to her, as the husband’s employer had nothing to do with all such wrongs. The Court stated that irrespective of the merits of these complaints, making such derogatory and defamatory remarks in the form of complaints to the spouse’s employer were nothing but cruelty. Thus, the Court stated that there was no infirmity in the impugned judgment passed by the Family Court and accordingly, dismissed the appeal. De...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (NAGPUR BENCH) Crl. Appln. No. 1249 of 1997 Decided On: 10.03.2001 Prakash Tarachand Sakhre Vs. Ashok Pundloikrao Wajge and Ors.  Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawy...

Case Number-Application U/s 482 No. 28863 of 2024The Allahabad High Court recently refused to quash criminal proceedings against a man accused of uploading an intimate video of him and his wife on Facebook.Justice Vinod Diwakar said the husband had gravely breached the sanctity of the marital relations and the act of sharing such content amounts to a violation of the inherent confidentiality that defines the bond between husband and wife.The Court also observed that a husband is expected to honour the trust, faith and confidence reposed in him by his wife, particularly in the context of their intimate relationship.“Upon perusal of the record and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it's prima facie observed that the marriage does not grant a husband ownership or control over his wife, nor does it dilute her autonomy or right to privacy,” the single-judge said. The Court added that this breach of trust undermines the very foundation of the marital relationship and is n...

HIGH COURT OF DELHI  Date of decision: 10th July, 2025 CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 266/2025, CRL.M.A. 17180/2025 The Delhi High Court has observed that a highly qualified wife, who is unemployed, has a right to be supported and managed by the husband till the time she is able to get gainful employment or develop the source of income. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna rejected a husband's plea challenging a family court order directing him to pay Rs. 1 lakh ad-interim maintenance monthly to the wife. It was the case of the husband- an Australian citizen, that the wife was a highly qualified and accomplished individual with an extensive academic background and a strong professional trajectory. Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Best Divorce l...

Cause Title: Sadashiv Parbati Rupnawar v. The State of Maharashtra, [2025:BHC-AS:30887] Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer Contested divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court De...

Cruelty, Neglect Or Abandonment Of Elderly Parents Not Mere Moral Disgrace But Also Legal Violation: Allahabad High Court Stressing that no civilised society can condone such betrayal of our elders, the Allahabad High Court said that Courts must rise as the last bastion of compassion. Maintenance case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi Alimony case lawyer Best Alimony case lawyer in Delhi Domestic violence case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi Divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi Mutual consent divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in East Delhi Best divorce lawyer in Noida Best divorce lawyer in Central delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in West delhi Best divorce lawyer in south delhi Best divorce lawyer in south West delhi Best divorce lawyer in North delhi Best divorce lawyer in Rohini Best divorce lawyer in shahdara delhi Best divorce lawyer in anand vihar delhi NRI mutual consent divorce lawyer Transfer petition case ...

CONMT.PET.(C) NOS. 756-757/2024 IN SLP(C) NOS. 2775-2776/2024 The Supreme Court recently appointed former Uttarakhand High Court Chief Justice Ritu Bahri as a mediator in a child custody battle between a husband and wife. In the order passed on July 21, the Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran directed Justice Bahri to consider all the issues pending between the couple. “With the consent of parties, we appoint Hon’ble Ms. Justice Ritu Bahri, Former Chief Justice of High Court of Uttarakhand as Mediator. The Mediator shall consider all the issues between the parties. The fee of the learned Mediator would be decided by the Mediator in consultation with the learned counsel for the parties,” the Court ordered.  The Court also pulled up the wife for dragging the child into the battle. The Court was dealing with a contempt of court petition moved by the husband in relation to the visitation rights granted to him by a family court. In Sep...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Best Divorce lawyer NRI mutual consent divorce case lawyer Senior citizen tribunal case lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer Contested divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Adultery ...

In a matrimonial appeal arising under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the Telangana High Court has declined to dissolve a marriage on the ground of the husband’s alleged impotency, holding that the wife had failed to substantiate her claim through credible medical evidence. The appellant, a 38-year-old software engineer, had approached the High Court challenging the dismissal of her divorce petition by the Family Court. She alleged that her 33-year-old husband, a government employee, was sexually impotent and had concealed his condition prior to their marriage in 2013. The petition sought dissolution of marriage on grounds of non-consummation due to alleged erectile dysfunction and cruelty, alongside a claim for permanent alimony amounting to ₹90 lakh. The appellant contended that the marriage remained unconsummated despite the couple living together in the United States for a prolonged period. She relied on her personal statements and referred to unspecified medical issues and failed su...

Supreme Court: While considering transfer petitions filed by husband and wife seeking transfer of their pending suits to competent courts in Rohini, Delhi and Hapur, Uttar Pradesh respectively and other connected matters; the Division Bench of B.R. Gavai, CJ., and Augustine George Masih*, J., deemed it fit to invoke the power under Article 142 of the Constitution and dissolved the marriage between the parties. The Court further held that guidelines framed by Allahabad High Court in Mukesh Bansal v. State of U.P., 2022 SCC OnLine All 395, vis-a-vis ‘Constitution of Family Welfare Committees’ for safeguards regarding misuse of Section 498A of the IPC, shall remain in effect and be implemented by the appropriate authorities. The Court also directed the wife to not use her influence as an IPS Officer against the husband, his family and relatives. The Court also directed the wife and her parents to tender unconditional apology to the husband and his family members for physical and mental tr...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer Contested divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Adultery divorce case lawyer in Delhi India NRI mutual consent divorce Best criminal...

Cause Title: A v. B (Case No.: C.R.R. 770 of 2024) While asking a man to pay higher amount of maintenance to his estranged wife, the Calcutta High Court has observed that the actual income of an individual would be very different from the figures shown in the income tax return and this is why the Courts often look beyond I.T. returns while determining the income of a person, especially in proceedings such as maintenance cases. The High Court was considering the Revision Application preferred by the wife/petitioner assailing the order passed under Section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), reducing the quantum of maintenance from Rs. 30,000 to the tune of Rs. 20,000 per month. Another application was filed by the husband assailing the same order, seeking a further reduction in the quantum of maintenance from the tune of Rs. 20,000 and also with respect to the date of effect, which should have been from the date of retirement of the estranged husband. Noting that the husband h...

X v. Y, Family Court Appeal No. 53 of 2021, decided on 17-7-2025 Bombay High Court: In the present appeal, the appellant-wife challenged the judgment passed by the Family Court on 28-11-2019, whereby her petition for the restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed and the counterclaim of the respondent-husband for divorce was allowed and the divorce was granted. The Division Bench of Revati Mohite Dere and Dr. Neela Gokhale*, JJ., opined that the wife’s behaviour with his husband’s employees, humiliating him in front of his friends, refusing sexual relations, and accusing him of extra-marital affairs were all instances of ‘cruelty’ that her husband was subjected to. The Court dismissed the appeal and held that the judgment passed by the Family Court was well-reasoned because the wife subjected her husband to cruelty and had deserted him. Divorce on the ground of cruelty Restitution of conjugal rights Right to residence order Interim maintenance case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi I...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer Contested divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Adultery divorce case lawyer in Delhi India Best civil case lawyer Best criminal cas...

Sachin Arora v. Manju Arora, decided on 10-5-2023 Delhi High Court: In a case wherein the petitioner challenged the orders passed by the Family Court wherein the application preferred by the respondent for summoning the CCTV footage, booking details and reservation records of the said room in Hotel Fairmont, a Single Judge Bench of Rekha Palli, J.* observed that the respondent was the estranged wife of the petitioner who had no direct evidence of her husband indulging in acts of adultery and by resort to Section 14 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (‘FCA’), she was, only trying to seek production of evidence which she reasonably believed would prove her charge of adultery which by its very nature could be inferred only from circumstances. The Court further opined that the Family Court by way of the impugned orders had sought records which pertained only to the respondent’s husband and not to his friend or her daughter. Therefore, there was no question about their right of privacy being vi...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 X v. Y, Crl. Rev. P. No. 622 of 2024, decided on 15-7-2025. Delhi High Court: In a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioner-husband for setting aside the judgment dated 6-4-2024 (impugned judgment), wherein the Additional Sessions Judge had directed payment of Rs. 1 lakh per month as maintenance, a Single Judge Bench of Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma, J., while upholding the impugned judgment, had stated that the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (‘DV Act’) did not distinguish between first and subsequent marriage for purposes of entitlement to maintenance. Background The wife (respondent) had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the DV Act, seeking reliefs under Section...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Denial of physical relationship to husband & suspecting him of an extra-marital affair amounts to cruelty & is hence a ground for divorce, the Bombay High Court held while refusing relief to a woman challenging a Family Court's Divorce Order. A division bench of Justice Revati Mohite Dere & Justice Neela Gokhale on Thursday said the woman's conduct can be construed as "cruelty" against her husband. The Court dismissed the woman's petition challenging a family court order allowing the man's plea for divorce. The woman had also sought direction to her husband to pay her a monthly maintenance of Rs 1 lakh. The couple got married in 2013, but started living separately in December 2014. In 2015, the man approached the family court in Pune seeking divorce on the grounds of cruelty, which was granted. The woman, in her plea, stated that her in-la...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Parvati v. Vyankat, Writ Petition No. 6529 of 2025, decided on 15-7-2025 Bombay High Court: The present writ petition was filed by the biological mother (Petitioner) of a five and half year-old daughter, challenging the rejection of her interim custody application by the District Judge. A Single Judge Bench of S.G. Chapalgaonkar, J., allowed the petition and granted interim custody of the minor girl to the mother, holding that under Section 6(a) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 (the ‘Act of 1956’), the mother was the natural guardian after the father’s death, unless it was established that she had an adverse interest or was incapable of securing the welfare of the minor. Decision: The Court acknowledged that while the child had been in the custody of the respondents for almost the last four years, despite that, the Court had to primarily look for the welfare of the child. ...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Best criminal case lawyer Top criminal case lawyer Cheque bounce case lawyer in Delhi Best cheque bounce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma court delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 612 of 2025 A husband has no legal right to demand access to his wife’s personal information, including her phone and bank passwords, the Chhattisgarh High Court has ruled, according to a report by LiveLaw. The observation was made by Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey while hearing a plea filed by a man whose request for his wife’s call detail records (CDRs) was rejected by the Family Court. The petitioner had moved the High Court challenging that order, the report added. The bench stated that any such compulsion by a husband amounts to a breach of the wife’s right to privacy and would invite action under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. “Marriage does not grant the husband automatic access to the wife’s private information, communications and personal belongings. The husband cannot compel the wife to share her passwords ...

Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi +91 85957 22509 Kalidas Sopanrao Landge and Ors v State of Maharashtra and Anr.  The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad recently quashed a cruelty case against a matchmaker (also a family friend of the husband) who was accused of hiding the groom’s impotency before marriage.  The Court ruled that he cannot be prosecuted for the offence of cruelty to wife under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code since he is not a relative of the husband. "Section 498-A of the I.P.C. stipulates that whoever, being the husband or the relatives of the husband of a woman, subject such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment...Therefore, applicant No.5 cannot be prosecuted, as he is not a relative of the other applicants." the court said in its July 2 order. A Bench of Justice V V Kankanwadi and Justice Sanjay Deshmukh also cleared the woman’s mother-in-law, sister-in-law, and paternal aunt of similar charge...

Case Title: ARP vs State of Maharashtra (Criminal Application 900 of 2025) The Bombay High Court recently while quashing a section 498A IPC case against a family observed that marital discords have now-a-days become a menace in the society and that because of the two persons fighting over petty issues, the concept of marriage, which is 'sacrosanct' for Hindus is suffering a setback. A division bench of Justices Nitin Sambre and Mahendra Nerlikar noted the 'trend' of women filing FIR against as many relatives of the husband as possible and said thus there is a need to look at matrimonial discord matters from a 'different' angle. "Needless to mention that considering the recent trend of filing first information reports against as many as persons from husband side, has become imperative to look the matters of matrimonial disputes from a different angle, and therefore, if the parties settle their disputes amicably in order to live peacefully, it is the duty of ...