Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from December, 2025

Best Divorce Lawyer in Delhi

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi – Advocate Devashish Maharishi When it comes to sensitive matrimonial disputes, choosing the best divorce case lawyer in Delhi can make a crucial difference in the outcome of your case. Whether you are facing a contested divorce, domestic violence issues, or seeking mutual consent divorce, Advocate Devashish Maharishi provides strategic, compassionate, and result-oriented legal representation at Karkardooma Court, Delhi . With extensive experience in matrimonial and family law matters, Advocate Devashish Maharishi is known for handling complex divorce cases with professionalism and confidentiality. Why Choose Advocate Devashish Maharishi – Divorce Lawyer in Delhi? Finding the right divorce advocate is essential when your personal, financial, and emotional future is at stake. Advocate Devashish Maharishi is widely trusted for: ✔ Strong representation in Karkardooma Court & Delhi District Courts ✔ Expertise in contested and mutual consen...

Finality of Legal Proceedings Explained: Delhi High Court Judgment & Expert Advice from Leading Delhi Advocate

⚖️ Delhi High Court Reaffirms Finality of Legal Proceedings – Get Strategic Legal Representation in Delhi NCR The  Delhi High Court , in  MMTC Ltd. v. Anglo American Metallurgical Pty. Ltd. (24 December 2025) , has strongly reiterated that  once a dispute is conclusively decided by a competent forum, it cannot be reopened through abuse of legal process . The Court held that  civil suits alleging fraud cannot be used to invalidate finalized arbitral awards , especially after affirmation by the  Supreme Court of India . This judgment highlights an important legal principle: 👉  Timely, well-planned litigation strategy is crucial. Failure to raise appropriate grounds at the correct stage can permanently close legal remedies. Whether it is  commercial litigation, civil disputes, or matrimonial cases , courts increasingly discourage frivolous or delayed proceedings. 👨‍⚖️ Advocate Devashish Maharishi – Trusted Lawyer in Karkardooma Court, Delhi If you are s...

Top Divorce Lawyer in Delhi

Foreign Divorce Jurisdiction & NRI Matrimonial Disputes in India – Legal Insight from Delhi Divorce Lawyer The  Calcutta High Court’s recent ruling  has brought much-needed clarity on  foreign jurisdiction in matrimonial disputes , especially in cases involving  NRI marriages solemnised in India . The judgment is significant for spouses facing  cross-border divorce, maintenance, and custody disputes , particularly when one spouse resides abroad. Key Legal Issue: Can a Foreign Court Decide Divorce of an Indian Marriage? In the case examined by the High Court, the marriage was solemnised in  Kolkata , but matrimonial disputes later arose after the wife moved to the  United Kingdom . While the husband filed for divorce before an  Indian court , the wife initiated  divorce and maintenance proceedings in the UK , claiming residence and last matrimonial cohabitation there. The Indian trial court restrained the wife from continuing foreign proce...

Best Divorce case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi

⚖️  Bombay High Court Clarifies Interim Maintenance Rights The  Bombay High Court  has ruled that  interim maintenance must be paid from the date of application, not the date of the court order . The Court also clarified that the word  “each”  means  wife and every child are individually entitled to maintenance , ensuring better financial protection for dependents. 📌  Key Takeaway: Maintenance should be based on the  needs of children , not merely a percentage of the husband’s income. This judgment strengthens the rights of wives and children in  maintenance, alimony, and domestic violence cases . 👨‍⚖️  Need Legal Help in Divorce or Maintenance, DVAct Domestic violence case, Divorce & Family Matters? Best Divorce & Maintenance Lawyer 📍 Karkardooma Court | Delhi ✔ Interim Maintenance & Alimony ✔ Contested & Mutual Divorce ✔ Domestic Violence Cases ✔ Child Custody & Support ✔ CAW Cell Complaints ✔ NRI & Tran...

Bombay High Court on Interim Maintenance | Maintenance from Date of Application | Family Law Update

Bombay High Court on Interim Maintenance | Maintenance from Date of Application | Family Law Update Description Bombay High Court held that interim maintenance must be paid from the date of application and clarified that wife and each child are individually entitled to maintenance. Read full case analysis and legal implications. Bombay High Court Clarifies Interim Maintenance: Payable from Date of Application & Individually to Wife and Children Major Relief for Wives & Children | Family Law Update X v. Y, Writ Petition No. 3828 of 2024 | Decided on 12 December 2025 In a significant ruling on interim maintenance under matrimonial law , the Bombay High Court has reiterated that maintenance must be awarded from the date of filing of the application and not from the date of the order . The Court also clarified the interpretation of the word “each” in maintenance orders, holding that wife and each child are individually entitled to the specified amount . The judgment was de...

Cheque Bounce case Lawyer

Himachal Pradesh High Court Judgment Failure to prove financial capacity can rebut S.139 presump-tion. Dishonour of cheque N. I. Act - S.138, 139 & 118(a) Financial capacity of complainant. Where the complain-ant failed to establish her financial capacity to advance the al-leged loan and material inconsistencies emerged regarding prior cheque-bounce litigation by her husband against the same accused, the presumption under Ss.118 & 139 stood ef-fectively rebutted. In the absence of credible proof of ad-vancement of the loan, the benefit of doubt was rightly ex-tended and the accused was entitled to acquittal. वित्तीय क्षमता नहीं, तो S.138 नहीं सिर्फ चेक काफी नहीं, ऋण साबित करना ज़रूरी अविश्वसनीय कहानी = आरोपी बरी  Pre-sumption तब तक ही, जब तक क्षमता सिद्ध हो  Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi Top lawyer for Contested Divorce case, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Domestic violence case, CAW cell Complaint case, Quashing pe...

Best Criminal Case Lawyer in Karkardooma Court Delhi India

Supreme Court Clarifies Law on Abatement of Criminal Revision Proceedings After Death of Informant or Accused (2025 INSC 1484 | Syed Shahnawaz Ali v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.) The Supreme Court of India has delivered an important judgment clarifying whether criminal revision proceedings abate upon the death of the revisionist . The ruling has significant implications for victims’ rights, criminal procedure, and revisional jurisdiction under the CrPC . 👨‍⚖️ Bench Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Manoj Misra Key Legal Issue Does a criminal revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 abate automatically on the death of the revisionist? Supreme Court’s Ruling: No Automatic Abatement in All Cases The Supreme Court held that revision proceedings do not automatically abate on the death of the revisionist. The outcome depends on who filed the revision and the nature of the order challenged . ✔️ When Revision Does Not Abate When the ...

Best Divorce case & Maintenance case lawyer in Delhi

⚖️ Allahabad High Court on Maintenance & Social Media Income | Important Family Law Update The  Allahabad High Court  has reaffirmed that  mere presence on YouTube, Instagram, or other digital platforms does not prove income  in maintenance cases. 🔹  Key Observations by the Court: ✔️ Social media activity ≠ proof of earnings ✔️ Digital income is uncertain, irregular, and fluctuating ✔️ Maintenance cannot be denied on assumptions or conjectures ✔️ Documentary financial evidence is mandatory ✔️ Actual income of both spouses must be fairly assessed 📜  Based on Supreme Court Guidelines –  Rajnesh v. Neha The Court reiterated that Family Courts must examine: • Income affidavits of both spouses • Salary slips / ITRs • Bank statements • Employment details • Liabilities and lifestyle ❌ Maintenance cannot be rejected without following these binding guidelines. 🏛️  Final Direction of the Allahabad High Court ✔️ Family Court order denying maintenance ...

Best Lawyer in Delhi

📜 Supreme Court of India & Arbitration Law: A Shift in Approach to Non-Signatories ⚖️ In just one year, the Supreme Court of India delivered two landmark arbitration judgments that reshape how non-signatories are treated in arbitral proceedings—and they seem to pull in opposite directions. 🔍 Key Cases Explained: 1️⃣ Ajay Madhusudan Patel v. Jyotrindra S. Patel ✔️ A three-Judge Bench ✔️ Focused on the referral stage (Section 11, Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996) ✔️ Took an inclusive, consent-based approach ✔️ Held that even non-signatories can be referred to arbitration if they are “veritable parties” to the underlying agreement ➡️ The Court warned against a narrow interpretation that excludes necessary parties from arbitration. 2️⃣ Kamal Gupta v. L.R. Builders (P) Ltd. ✔️ A Division Bench ruling ✔️ Focused on the post-constitution stage of arbitration ✔️ Applied a strict privity of contract approach ✔️ Ruled that non-signatories cannot even observe arbitral p...

Supreme Court Quashes 498A & Dowry Case | Best Divorce & Criminal Matrimonial Lawyer in Delhi

Supreme Court Quashes 498A & Dowry Case | Best Divorce & Criminal Matrimonial Lawyer in Delhi In a significant judgment reinforcing safeguards against misuse of matrimonial laws, the Supreme Court of India has quashed a cruelty and dowry harassment case under Section 498A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act , holding that vague and general allegations cannot amount to cruelty . The judgment is a crucial precedent for husbands and families facing false or exaggerated matrimonial criminal cases . Key Supreme Court Judgment: BELIDE SWAGATH KUMAR vs State of Telangana A Bench of Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice R. Mahadevan ruled that: Sending money to parents or siblings does not constitute cruelty Asking a spouse to maintain Excel sheets of household expenses is not cruelty Allegations of financial dominance , without proof of physical or mental harm, do not meet the ingredients of Section 498A IPC General marital disagreements fall under the “wear and tear of marriage” Vague, o...

Best Divorce & Matrimonial Lawyer in Delhi | Maintenance, Domestic Violence & Criminal Cases

Best Divorce & Matrimonial Lawyer in Delhi | Maintenance, Domestic Violence & Criminal Cases If you are searching for the best divorce lawyer in Delhi or need expert legal support for a maintenance case, mutual consent divorce, domestic violence complaint, or criminal matrimonial dispute , getting the right legal guidance at the right time is crucial. Advocate Devashish Maharishi is a trusted and experienced divorce and criminal case lawyer in Delhi , handling complex matrimonial and family law disputes with professionalism, confidentiality, and strategic precision. Why Choose an Experienced Divorce Lawyer in Delhi? Matrimonial disputes often involve emotional stress, financial uncertainty, and legal complexity. An experienced lawyer ensures: Proper drafting and filing of cases Strong representation before Family Courts and Criminal Courts Protection of your legal rights Faster and lawful resolution of disputes Whether your case is contested or settled amicably, expert legal ...

Best Divorce Case Lawyer in Delhi

Married Son Cannot Deny Maintenance to Aged Mother: Kerala High Court Reaffirms Legal Duty Kerala High Court on Maintenance Rights of Parents under Section 125 CrPC In a significant judgment strengthening the rights of elderly parents, the  Kerala High Court  has ruled that a  married son cannot evade his statutory obligation to maintain his aged mother  by citing his own family responsibilities or the alleged financial support of the father. The Court upheld a  Family Court order granting monthly maintenance of Rs. 5,000  to a 60-year-old mother, reiterating that  a parent’s right to maintenance from her children is independent and unconditional  under  Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) . Background of the Case The case originated when a  60-year-old woman  approached the Family Court seeking  Rs. 25,000 per month  as maintenance from her son. She asserted that: She had  no independent source of in...