Skip to main content

Mutual Consent Divorce Lawyer in Delhi

Recently, a Delhi court examined the scope and object of interim maintenance under the criminal procedure law in a matrimonial dispute that raised significant questions about financial support, earning capacity, and the right of a wife to live with dignity after separation. The case involved competing claims regarding income, standard of living during marriage, and the extent of a husband’s statutory responsibility, particularly when he resides abroad.

The case arose from an application filed by the wife seeking interim maintenance under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). She claimed that following her separation from her husband, she was unable to maintain herself and had become dependent on her family for daily expenses. According to her, she had enjoyed a particular standard of living during the marriage, which could not be abruptly taken away after separation.

The husband opposed the claim, asserting that the marriage had lasted only about 13 months and that the wife had voluntarily withdrawn from the matrimonial home. He also relied on the fact that there were no children from the marriage and contended that the maintenance amount sought was excessive.

On behalf of the husband, it was argued that the maintenance application was not maintainable under the statute. He submitted that the wife was well-educated, professionally qualified, and capable of earning for herself. It was further alleged that she had concealed material details relating to her education and income. The husband also contended that he was residing in Dubai, where the cost of living was substantially higher, and therefore, the quantum of maintenance claimed Rs.8 lakh per month, was unreasonable and unsupported by particulars of expenditure.

On behalf of the wife, it was argued that being capable of employment and being actually employed were two distinct concepts. The wife contended that although she had worked prior to marriage, she was presently unemployed and unable to maintain herself. It was further submitted that she had left the matrimonial home due to alleged cruelty and that the husband, being a man of substantial means, was legally bound to maintain her in the same standard of living that she enjoyed during the subsistence of the marriage.

The court, presided over by Devender Kumar Garg, reiterated that the purpose of maintenance law is not limited to bare survival. The court observed that “sustenance does not mean leading the life of an animal or being reduced to an unperson” and emphasised that maintenance must ensure a dignified existence consistent with the social status and lifestyle the wife enjoyed in her husband’s home.

The court further held that an able-bodied husband cannot evade his statutory obligation to maintain his wife by merely asserting that she is educated or capable of earning. It noted that the husband had disclosed a monthly income of AED 40,000 in his affidavit of assets and liabilities but had failed to place on record his bank statements and VAT returns despite repeated directions. In such circumstances, the court held that an adverse inference was liable to be drawn and that some degree of “guesswork” became inevitable in assessing his income.

The contention that residence in Dubai and the higher cost of living abroad should exempt or dilute the maintenance obligation was also rejected.

Considering the material on record, the husband’s earning capacity, lifestyle, and the absence of any other dependants, the Court held that a monthly amount of Rs. 5 lakh constituted a reasonable sum towards interim maintenance and directed the husband to pay the same to the wife.


Advocate Devashish Maharishi | Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Delhi

Top lawyer for Contested Divorce case, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Domestic violence case, CAW cell Complaint case, Quashing petition and for Mutual Consent Divorce case in Delhi

📞 Need Legal Help?

If you're facing domestic abuse or going through a complex matrimonial dispute, I’m here to help. I offer consultations for:

✅ Mutual or contested divorce case

✅ Domestic violence protection

✅ Maintenance case, Alimony case Or Interim maintenance and custody

✅ Transfer petitions and NRI divorce matters


📍 Office: 137, J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, 110092

📞 Contact: 8595722509

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court delhi

Best Divorce lawyer Best divorce lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in East delhi Best divorce case lawyer in karkardooma Court Best divorce lawyer in Delhi Best divorce case lawyer in Delhi Best divorce lawyer in new delhi Best divorce lawyer in Tis Hazari Court central Delhi Best divorce lawyer in saket Court South Delhi Best divorce lawyer in dwarka Court delhi Best divorce lawyer in rohini Court Best divorce lawyer in North Delhi Mutual consent divorce lawyer Best mutual divorce lawyer Maintenance case lawyer Domestic violence case lawyer

When is an Offence Murder Or attempt to Murder in Delayed Death

Supreme Court Clarifies Murder vs. Attempt to Murder in Delayed Death: Key Takeaways from Maniklal Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh Criminal Appeal No. 5578 of 2024, Judgment Dated September 12, 2025 In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court has clarified the distinction between murder under Section 302 and attempt to murder under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) , specifically in cases where the death occurs long after the original assault due to medical complications like septicemia. The ruling came from the recent Maniklal Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh case , which sheds new light on how courts should treat delayed deaths caused by the injuries inflicted in an assault. Key Facts: The case involved the conviction of Maniklal Sahu and three co-accused for the murder of Rekhchand Verma. Rekhchand was assaulted by the accused on February 22, 2022, and suffered severe injuries. He survived for about nine months but eventually died on November 8, 2022, due to septicemia and pneum...

Legal Expert for Divorce, Maintenance, and Domestic Violence Cases in Delhi Courts

Legal Expert for Divorce, Maintenance, and Domestic Violence Cases in Delhi Courts Are you facing domestic abuse or navigating a complex matrimonial dispute ? Do you need a professional advocate to handle maintenance cases, alimony , interim maintenance , or custody issues? If so, you need the expertise of an experienced family law attorney who can provide strong representation in family courts across Delhi . Advocate Devashish Maharishi is one of the leading divorce and family law lawyers practicing in Delhi, with a focus on cases related to: Divorce (Mutual and Contested) Domestic Violence Protection Maintenance, Alimony, and Interim Maintenance Child Custody and Custody Disputes Transfer Petitions & NRI Divorce Cases With years of experience in handling matrimonial disputes, Advocate Devashish Maharishi offers legal assistance in various courts in Delhi, including: Karkardooma Court Saket Court Patiala House Court Tis Hazari Court Rohini Court Dwarka Court Whether you'r...